Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Sensitivity analyses using uncorrected event weight per procedure in individual patients yielded an almost significant OR (0.61, 95% CI: 0.37–1.02; p = 0.06), whereas only using first procedure per patient did not (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.34–1.37; p = 0.3) ( Table 5 ).
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
More central to our current interests, the main effect of response profile was also significant when considered a within-subject factor (F (1519) = 10.13, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.02) and almost significant when considered a between-subject factor (F (1161) = 3.57, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.02), being associated with a response profile x age interaction (F (3519) = 4.39, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.02).
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Those participants with a conservation index equal or below 0.7 had a greater relative increase in BMI (Kruskal-Wallis Test χ 2 = 11.4, p < 0.005) and almost significant decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (Kruskal-Wallis Test χ 2 = 5.8, p = 0.06) and in HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Kruskal-Wallis Test χ 2 = 5.8, p = 0.05) from baseline to 4-years follow-up than those with higher conservation index.
almost significantP = .061.2× alphagold
a decreasing trendP = .071.4× alphagold
A decreasing trend in overall hospitalization rate within the PA − group was seen preisolation ( P = .07) with an almost significant difference from the PA + group ( P = .06); however, no significant changes in slope or level within either group were seen within the pre- and postisolation segments ( Figure 3 , Table 4 ).
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The improvement of IPSS and IIEF5 scores also correlate with amplitude of MMN wave (r = −0.639; p = 0.04, and r = 0.628; p = 0.05, respectively) and there were almost significant correlations of IPSS with the other electrophysiological parameters (latency: r = 0.546, p = 0.06; and area: r = −0.368, p = 0.06).