“almost significant”

The levels of significance were P < 0.05 (almost significant) and P < 0.01 (significant). 3.

Two other mre like regulators were found to be differentially expressed: 1) mreB (MA1671) , when comparing TMA and acetate (and almost significant for TMA vs MeOH, p =0.0103), and 2) mreD (MA3130) , which was found to be more highly expressed in methylotrophic conditions and sits in a conserved cluster of genes that also contains hdrABC .

No relations could be found between tooth loss and the recorded demographic or health conditions, although the relation between tooth loss and bruxism was almost significant (p=0.012) since higher number of patients among those that lost teeth from 2004 to 2009 presented bruxism (40.5% vs. 17.7%).

On the one hand, when the analysis was stratified by the harvesting method and the effect of the work period was adjusted, the correlations between the % HRR and the Borg RPE were no longer significant, meanwhile statistically significant or almost significant correlations between the % HRR and the Omni RPE were found in all the worker groups ( p -value = 0.014, 0.015, and 0.086 for Ground, Ladder, and Platform groups, respectively), as shown in Figure 7 .

Subject 11 showed a difference that was almost significant using a parametric test (p = 0.0513), but clearly significant with a non-parametric test (p = 0.0157).

The most significant changes were the medial temporal lobe after a left-sided stroke going from almost significant at the 1% level ( p = 0.016) to becoming significant ( p = 0.006), the medial temporal lobe after a right-sided stroke going from significant ( p = 0.000) to not significant ( p = 0.013), and with the hippocampus after a right-sided stroke from significant ( p =.001) to not significant ( p = 0.59).

Only the induction of COR6.6 was almost significant ( p < 0.058) under normal growth conditions and was clearly significant under salinity stress conditions ( p < 0.016).

Post hoc analysis using Bonferoni correction for multiple comparison revealed a significant increase in hand function from the Initial assessment session (23.0 ±6.1 cm) to Week 6 (43.0 ±8.8 cm, p = 0.0086347), Week 12 (44.3 ±9.3 cm, p = 0.0076498), with an almost significant change for Week 18 (44.7 ±9.5 cm, p = 0.017671).

An almost significant motive × activity interaction was also observed, F 3.43,164.57 =3.43, P =.02, partial η2 =.067.

We found small increases in maternal deprivation from before to after the intervention, which were statistically significant or almost significant for intervention localities (P=0.021), control localities (P=0.056), and external control localities (P<0.001).

Otosclerosis: Otosclerosis is almost significant in the MHH dataset ( β = 12.8 , p = .023 which does not meet threshold for significance for multiple testing correction).

44 A significant reduction in Sartorius score was seen after 6 weeks and an almost significant reduction after 12 weeks of active treatment when compared with placebo ( P =0.024 and P =0.07, respectively). 44 Adalimumab was well tolerated, in general, but the active group experienced an almost significantly greater number of adverse events (mostly mild infections). 44 Kimbal et al conducted

There is an almost significant but small dependence on the moving velocity (F(3,9) = 4.89, p = 0.03): the higher the moving speed, the bigger the deviation and, consequently, the stronger the illusion.

The difference between groups in change from baseline-2 to 2 hours post-meal was almost significant for IVRT ( p = 0.03) but not for filling pressure ( p = 0.08).

We foundthat one of the two tests was almost significant (i.e., p < .03 based on Bonferroni correction): words versus numbers( t (18) = 2.25, p = .04).

3.2 Clinical correlation 3.2.1 RTLE The RTLE showed a significant correlation for the CPL (almost significant for E) with the age of onset (p = 0.0314, r = 0.6202 and for E p = 0.0516, r = − 0.5727) when looking at the ODI along the tract. 3.2.2 LTLE In LTLE there was a significant correlation between S for GFA and duration of epilepsy (p = 0.044, r = 0.65) in parallel with a trend for both the ICVF and the ODI (p = 0.067, r = 0.6 and p = 0.059, r = 0.61).

At 6 months, however, the WT had a similar level of 129.9 ± 4.7 mg/dL to that at 3 months, whereas the KOs had an increase of 191.4 ± 29.7 mg/dL, which was almost significant ( p = 0.036).

A second model was tested based only upon the almost significant item 5 “felt at home in nature” as the independent variable, which explained less variance, R 2 = 13.1, p = 0.04, but in this model, “felt at home in nature” was a significant predictor ( t = 2.2, p = 0.04).

Autoimmune disease There was no difference in initial CBL at the start (Figure 1 A) but an almost significant main effect was observed overall ( P value = 0.04). 3.2.2.

An almost significant main effect of positive variables on the stages of treatment was found (Wilks λ = .74, F = 1.71, p = .04, η 2 = .14).

At day 2, this decrease in BMP4 expression level progressed and was almost significant ( P =0.05) in comparison to the control level.

There was significant difference between the CBCT and clinical measurements for the buccal site ( p = 0.010), and almost significant for the mesial site (p = 0.05), but not for the distal sites ( p = 0.187) as seen in Table 1 .

X mitchelliana with an almost significant trend (P = 0.05, Fig 3B ).

The upper montane zone showed a decrease of threefold on fine root production from the natural Podocarpus forest to the burned Podocarpus forest, and a similar almost significant decrease on fine root turnover ( P = 0.05).

The main effect of Partner Type is almost significant ( p = .050).