Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantP = .0571.1× alphagold
There was a minor impairment in the performance of the individual subject after uptake of the alcohol, which was statistically significant in the AB001 experiment (baseline: 19.8 ± 7.8 seconds vs 22.6 ± 8.0 seconds, P < .05) and almost significant in the placebo experiment (19.5 ± 5.7 seconds vs 23.0 ± 11.2 seconds, P = .057).
almost significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Regarding the first assessment questionnaire, in response to the question “Do you consider that you have a healthy diet?”, there were statistically significant differences with the physical dimension score (rho = 0.197, p = 0.047) and the energy/fatigue health concept (rho = 0.210, p = 0.034), and almost significant differences with the total SF-36 score (rho = 0.19, p = 0.057). 3.3.3.
almost significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Biological significance of iris flecking A general linear model showed a significant sexual difference in total iris flecking (Table 1 ), with males having a smaller amount of iris flecking than females (difference: 1.27, p = 0.02) and an almost significant relationship between total iris flecking and wing length (slope: −0.07, p = 0.057).
almost significantP = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Likewise, children with a longer average duration of their slow waves had a lower overall accuracy, significantly so for slow wave duration derived at FPz (−0.77 ± 0.30 lower % accuracy per milliseconds longer duration, Z = −2.567, P = 0.010) and almost significant for slow wave duration derived at Cz (−0.57 ± 0.30 lower % accuracy per milliseconds longer duration, Z = −1.900, P = 0.057).
almost significantp-value = 0.05731.1× alphagold
We observed an almost significant (p-value = 0.0573) positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.3635) between HDI and the frequency of A subtype and a significant (p-value = 0.0122) negative correlation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = − 0.4669) between HDI and the frequency of D subtype (Fig. 1 S of supplementary material).
almost significantp value = 0.05751.1× alphagold
The Tajima’s D test detected significant deviations from neutrality in Og -1 and Og -2 (Mean D = − 2.01, p value = 0.0010), almost significant deviation in Osj -1 and Osj -2 (Mean D = − 1.29, p value = 0.0575), and non-significant deviation in Osi -1 and Osi -2 (Additional file 5 : Table S3).