“almost significant”

However, EAdV-1 positivity in the Jeju region was relatively high (4.2%, 3/71) and almost significant ( p = 0.055) compared with the total regional positivity.

When Product B was analysed by dosage, there was an almost significant increase post-supplementation for the 600 mg dose ( p = 0.055), while there was no significant difference at 200 mg, or for either dose of Product A ( Table 2 ). 3.3.2.

There was no significant increase between level 2 and 3 periods ( p value = 0.298), while the increase between level 1 and 2 periods was almost significant ( p value = 0.055).

In a one-sided test this would be almost significant, P = 0.055.

In contrast, no significant or almost significant interactions were observed for sweetness in either food model, sourness in Gj ( p = 0.055), or bitterness in Cp ( Table 4 ).

Regarding the colonization with MDR-indicator pathogens in the nasal cavity, there was a significant increase in the MRSA-colonized patients (mixed linear regression p = 0.002) and an almost significant increase in the percentage of samples with ESBL-E (mixed linear regression p = 0.055), but no significant increase in the A. baumannii complex colonization (mixed linear regression p = 0.131).

For the fungal communities, significant differences occurred at the bases of seminal roots only, but the difference at the apices of seminal roots was almost significant ( mvabund P = 0.055; Table 2 ).

Further ANOVAs comparing the performance of lesion groups revealed that this effect was attributable to a significant Lesion × CS interaction [ F (1,14) = 7.86, p < 0.02] and an almost significant Lesion effect ( F (1,11) = 4.37, p = 0.055) between sham-operated and IL-lesioned rats, as well as a near significant CS × Lesion group interaction between the IL and PL groups [ F (1,11) = 4.55, p = 0.056].

Furthermore, an almost significant decrease of MDSC frequency was found in patients 1–3 years after therapy compared to those at the end of therapy ( Fig 4B ) (p = 0.055).

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that none of the HV groups were a significant discriminant factor in predicting treatment outcome (area under the curve p -value >0.05), even though HV-84, which had the highest adjusted R 2 values in the Rd linear models, was almost significant ( p -value = 0.0557) ( Figure 5b ).

Moreover, while the vehicle group spent more than half of the trial duration within the novel arm, the total time of novel arm exploration was reduced by the LPA treatment (F 2, 34 = 3.445, P = 0.0442), which was significant for the 0.4 μg dose (*p<0.05) and an almost significant for the 2 μg group (p = 0.0558) ( Figure 3B ).

In the mesothelium of the posterior rudiment, the increase in percentage of TUNEL-positive cells remains almost significant until day 7 (p = 0.056), before declining later on (Figure 10 ).

The presence of PDAC resulted in an almost significant ( p = 0.056) decrease in fiber CSA in the gastrocnemius muscle when controlled for the factor sex ( p = 0.238) by ANOVA.

Nevertheless, the difference between CC8 and CC5 was almost significant ( p = 0.056; Figure 2G ).

When pooling both training groups (dual-task and single-task training group) we found an almost significant correlation ( r (32) = 0.331, p = 0.056) controlling for age and sex.

To account for the reduced power, and considering the consistent non‐significant results for any interaction factor, we repeated the analysis including only main effects and, consistently with the previous results, we observed a main effect for treatment ( F (39) = 4.47, p = 0.043) and separation ( F (39) = 7.64, p = 0.010), but only an almost significant trend for testing day ( F (39) = 3.965, p = 0.056).

Additionally, OBC#1 “clench or grind teeth when asleep” and OBC#3 “grind teeth together during waking hours” were found to be almost significant in our study, but no association was observed between sleep/awake bruxism and pain chronicity ( P = .056 and .051).

BMI at inclusion was almost significant ( P = 0.056) (Table S2).

This difference was almost significant and the trauma history could be related to poorer response (p = 0.056, calculated by chi-square test).

Based on MyPlate guidelines, in general, for “Pattern I ”, the participant in Q4 had a significantly higher intake of grain (6.38 ± 0.21oz-e; p < 0.001), dairy (0.43 ± 0.02c; p < 0.001), protein (8.35 ± 0.25oz-e; p < 0.001), and it was almost significant for vegetables (0.77 ± 0.04c; p = 0.056) in comparison to Q1 participants (grain = 4.56 ± 0.19 oz-e; dairy = 0.24 ± 0.03c; vegetables = 0.62 ± 0.05c; and protein = 3.05 ± 0.15 oz-e).

No significant association between MetS and IPSS, and Qmax was found; however, there was an almost significant association with PSA (MD = 0.24 ng/ml, p = 0.056). 91 Li et al. 92 also significantly associated MetS with higher annual prostate growth rate and prostate volume; no association was found between MetS and IPSS/IPSS subgroups.

The association with worries was almost significant ( p = .056), which bears mentioning because a recent study with cognitively normal memory clinic patients [ 33 ] and a community-based study [ 20 , 37 ] also reported an association of worries with amyloid pathology.

No parameter was shown to be statistically significantly different between genders, although we observed an almost significant difference regarding birth weight (P = 0.056).

The result showed a significant interaction effect between group and time on demands ( F (3;1928) = 4.04, p = .007), and an almost significant interaction effect ( F (3;3;1917) = 2.52, p = .056) between group and time on decision authority.

Another almost significant group*time interaction was found for PASE ( p = 0.056, F = 3.888, Cohen’s d = 0.66).