Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost reached significance”

322 sentences · 322 papers · 368 search hits before verification

In the literature

almost reached significancep = 0.0811.6× alpha
Of the seven included global scores (reading accuracy, reading speed, writing accuracy, phonemic awareness, memory and callosal transfer), a significant difference emerged for Global writing accuracy ( p = 0.029, partial eta square = 0.033), while Global reading accuracy and Global phonemic awareness almost reached significance ( p = 0.081, partial eta square = 0.023 and p = 0.071, partial eta square = 0.021, respectively).
almost reached significancep = 0.0831.7× alpha
However, when the structural language scales were examined separately in children with DLD, none of them reached significance, although the syntactic and pragmatic scales almost reached significance ( p = 0.083; p = 0.077). 3.4.3.
almost reached significancep = 0.0841.7× alpha
Multivariable analysis revealed that only tumor stage was significantly associated with pathological response to chemotherapy ( p = 0.032), although HER2 status and clinical response as a continuous variable almost reached significance ( p = 0.084 and p = 0.063, respectively).
almost reached significancep = .0881.8× alpha
However, neither the health and lifestyle factors (Step 3) nor network size (Step 4) was associated with R 2 increments, although baseline network size almost reached significance for change in explained variance, R 2 change = .002, F change (1, 594) = 2.93, p = .088 [ β = .046, t (594) = 1.71, p = .088].
However, the difference in NPO at 3-month follow-up between the 2 groups almost reached significance (Cuidándome: mean 5.45, SD 3.15 vs comparison: mean 7.66, SD 4.82; P =.09), and we estimated small (T1: d =0.10) and medium (T2: d =0.54 and T3: d =0.38) effect sizes ( Table 4 ).
almost reached significancep = 0.4489.0× alpha
Results showed that the interaction between Focal Goal Magnitude × Alternative Goal Magnitude (β = −0.14, p = 0.081) as well as the interaction between Alternative Goal Magnitude × Painfulness (β = 0.15, p = 0.057) almost reached significance, whereas the interaction between Focal Goal Magnitude × Painfulness did not (β = 0.06, p = 0.448).
However, the top PTPRD SNP association that almost reached significance in the meta-analysis of naltrexone-treated patients in COMBINE and PREDICT, was driven by a genome-wide significant association in the COMBINE sample, while showing no significant association in the PREDICT sample, although the direction of effect in PREDICT was consistent with the effect in COMBINE and the 95% confidence intervals overlapped (Supplementary Fig.