“a weakly significant difference”

There was a weakly significant difference between the model with only g ( x ) ( M = 0 . 651 , SD = 0 . 036 ) and the model with both g ( x ) and f ( x ), p = 0 . 061 .

Additionally, a weakly significant difference was noted in outpatient hospital care visits (−0.11, p = 0.062, CI −0.24 to 0.01).

All but Cer(d18:1/18:0), TG(50:1), TG(50:2), SM(40:1), and SM(42:1) were proven to have strongly significantly different distributions in the two groups, while Cer(d18:1/16:0) showed only a weakly significant difference ( p = 0.067).

Statistical analysis indicated a weakly significant difference ( p = 0.073, Student’s t test), but the overall trend indicates that intercluster interactions were reduced.

Difference contrast analysis showed significant differences between low and medium arousal words ( F (1,48) = 4.9, p = 0.032, η 2 = 0.093) and a weakly significant difference between medium and high arousal words ( F (1,48) = 3.36, p = 0.073, η 2 = 0.065).

The results indicated a significant difference in the “good/bad” mood dimension ( p = .030), with a large effect size ( d = 0.820), as well as a weakly significant difference in the calm/nervous mood dimension ( p = .076) with a medium effect size ( d = 0.665).

Furthermore, we observe a weakly significant difference between transfers within Israel and Germany in Study 2 ( p = . 099 , two-sided FP).

In this murine cohort, glucuronic acid levels were also a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (HR=1.29, p=0.018), and a weakly significant difference in survival was observed between the top and bottom quartiles of glucuronic acid levels in this cohort (p=0.1, Figure 1C ).

For respondents with high familiarity ratings, there is a weakly significant difference between socially interactive and solitary respondents, with the former having lower disruption ratings than the latter ( U = 197.000, p < 0.1).

There is also a weakly significant difference between speciation rates of BAMM and MTBD in our partial subset that was not found in the smaller complete subset.

In support of this possibility, Rosen (1996) observed that in the rat somatosensory/somatomotor cortex, asymmetry in tissue volume is strongly associated with the LR differences in the numbers of two subtypes of neuron, but there is only a weakly significant difference in cell packing density for one of the neuronal subtypes, suggesting that the left and right sides have similar neural architectures and show a proportional scaling to achieve differences in the quantity of neural tissue.

Conclusions Our results show a weakly significant difference between affected and unaffected twins in the cross-sectional prevalence of GBV-C viremia.

A weakly significant difference in the mean number of women DCs was observed across regions with the West having the highest mean number of women DCs and the Midwest having the lowest.

A weakly significant difference in HHS values was demonstrated in patients undergoing cemented versus non-cemented endoprostheses.

P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, whereas 0.05< P<0.1 was considered to indicate a weakly significant difference.

The pairwise t-tests show, after matching, no statistically significant differences in the observed variables (at the 5% level for all variables, with one variable presenting a weakly significant difference at the 10% level).

There is a weakly significant difference between the proportion of entrepreneurs among SHS adopters (19.65%) and non-adopters (15.02%).

The comparison of measurements in the KL, EP, and LP sections between OCT and traditional histopathology shows a weakly significant difference only for the LP compartment (Table 5 ).

Only a weakly significant difference was detected between different pigs.

Exceptions are the Nnf1–Ndc80C length ( p = 1.0%) and the Ndc80C–Ndc80N length ( p = 1.9%) in the DMSO-treated Nnf1–Ndc80C–Ndc80N triple, showing a weakly significant difference, see Example 3.4.

We consider it possible that PD-L1 decreases in tissues as a change in immune profile during HCV SVR, as with DAAs treatment because we analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes and there was a weakly significant difference compared with the liver tissue analysis.

A weakly significant difference (p-value rather close to α = 0.05%) could be found only for BT vs.

did not find a significant difference in the right eye but reported a weakly significant difference in the left eye [ 48 ].

It should be noted that siGal3 and its control did register as p < 0.043, suggesting a weakly significant difference.

For humans, there was no difference in NI or Z* between OXPHOS genes encoded in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes ( P MWU > 0.46 for both statistics), whereas for flies there was a weakly significant difference that was driven by the fact that the nuclear OXPHOS genes in our sample had values of NI and Z* that were more consistent with an excess of nonsynonymous substitutions ( NI , P MWU = 0.026; Z* , P MWU = 0.022) ( Figure S2 ).