Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a weak trend”

1,405 sentences · 1,405 papers · 1,881 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a weak trendp = 0.0721.4× alphagold
The GLM for happy ratings revealed a main effect of time of assessment, F (1, 68) = 72.479, p < 0.0001, η 2 partial = 0.516 (greater happiness after the memory condition than after the film clip), no main effect of memory condition, F (1, 68) = 0.069, p = 0.793, η 2 partial = 0.001, and only a weak trend toward a significant interaction of time and memory condition, F (1, 68) = 3.328, p = 0.072, η 2 partial = 0.047 (higher increases in happiness in the nostalgia condition).
a weak trendP = 0.0721.4× alphagold
Whilst univariate analysis failed to show any statistically significant group differences (P > 0.050) in any of the mean values of measured reproductive parameters, multivariable Cox regression suggested that there was a weak trend (P = 0.072) for Group A animals to achieve first service earlier than their Group R counterparts (62.6 weeks versus 65.3 weeks).
a weak trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
There was no effect of Group ( F [1, 67] < 1) and a weak trend for an interaction between Group and Session ( F [1, 67] = 3.2, p = 0.079, η p 2 = 0.045), indicating a slight increase of correct items from t1 to t2 [46.5 ± 1.6 vs. 49.9 ± 1.6; t (31) = 2.7, p = 0.011] in the CT group, while no substantial change was observed in the passive control group [46.4 ± 1.5 vs. 46.9 ± 1.5; t (36) < 1].
a weak trendp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Indeed, when we analyzed the data for each condition separately, we observed a substantial linear trend ( F (1,15) = 11.544, p = 0.004 for sd; F (1,15) = 12.165, p = 0.003 for mean deviation) for the cue/mask condition, but no such trend for the cue/no-mask baseline condition ( F = 0.764, p = 0.52 for sd; F = 0.041, p = 0.84 for mean deviation) and if anything a weak trend in the opposite direction for the no-cue/mask condition ( F = 3.45, p = 0.08 for sd; F = 3.464, p = 0.08 mean deviation).
APDQ Multiple regression analysis of overall scores showed a weak trend towards lower scores in assessment of attitudes towards patients with a previous diagnosis of BPD compared with patients with a previous diagnosis of depression (lower scores indicate more negative attitudes in the APDQ and this is consistent with findings from the Appleby measure); however, this difference fell just short of statistical significance ( z = 1.75, P = 0.08).
a weak trendP = 0.081.6× alphagold
The pronounced difference observed prior to surgery between GDM and PDM rats was reduced to a weak trend after the lesion (main effect of group: F 1,28 = 3.3, P = 0.08, p η 2 = 0.11), thereby further demonstrating that AIC lesions differentially influenced the performance of rats based on their ability to establish the optimal strategy in the task.
a weak trendp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Although NK cell subset frequencies were not significantly different when stratified by DARC genotype irrespective of HIV status ( Fig 2C and 2D ), a weak trend was noted towards higher frequencies of immature CD56 bright cells in DARC-null compared to DARC-positive HIV negative donors (p = 0.08, Fig 2C ).