Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a weak trend”

1,405 sentences · 1,405 papers · 1,881 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a weak trendp = 0.367.2× alphagold
Our analysis of these data, although severely underpowered, did show a weak trend toward worse survival among HOXD12 gene body hypermethylated patients in both overall survival (HR = 2.8, p = 0.36) and progression-free survival (HR = 2.8, p = 0.36) (Supplemental Fig. 16).
a weak trendp = 0.37707.5× alphagold
Apart from a weak trend to decrease social play at the highest dose of 10 mg/kg ( p = 0.3770), the DAT inhibitor GBR‐12909 administered alone at doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg failed to modulate elements of social behavior (Figure 4e ), including passive social behavior ( p = 0.6125), anogenital sniffing ( p = 0.6783), and general social behavior ( p = 0.6702).
a weak trendP = 0.4418.8× alphagold
A weak trend of sBAT-R 2 * normalization was observed after reheating (0.15±0.70 s -1 , P = 0.441 compared to the Baseline MRI and -0.50±1.33 s -1 , P = 0.173 compared to the Cold MRI ) ( Table 1 , Fig 3B ) whereas SAT-R 2 * remained increased (0.47±0.55 s -1 , P = 0.028 compared to the Baseline MRI and 0.07±0.49 s -1 , P = 0.767 compared to the Cold MRI ) ( Table 1 , Fig 3B ).
a weak trendp = 0.489.6× alphagold
(d) Impact of maternal infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis on PPD-specific immune responses in infancy Cord blood samples obtained from infants of mothers with LTBI, compared to those without LTBI, showed a weak trend towards higher T-cell responses ( p = 0.48 for IFN-γ ( figure 4 a ), p = 0.20 for IL-2 ( figure 4 b ), p = 0.27 for TNF-α ( figure 4 c ), p = 0.40 for all cytokines, combined ( figure 4 d )).
a weak trendp = 0.61412.3× alphagold
At the same time, AR protein expression, assessed as the percentage of AR-positive tumor cells (nuclei)), showed a weak trend toward association with infiltrative FLAIR-hyperintense volume (β = 0.01, 95% CI: −0.02–0.04, p = 0.614), but not clear relationship with contrast-enhancing volume after multivariable adjustment (Fig. 5 , B).
a weak trendp = 0.74314.9× alphagold
Thus, we further analyzed these issues and observed that higher DEB size showed a weak trend to be correlated with poor treatment CR, ORR, and OS, but without statistical analysis; higher drug dosage did not correlate with CR, ORR, or OS ( p = 0.743) ( Fig. 4Z ).
a weak trendp = 0.88917.8× alphagold
This was non-significant for all four response variables, although there was a weak trend towards gaze alternating more at the helpful experimenter (looking: Estimate ± SE = -0.028 ± 0.201, z = -0.14, p = 0.889; interacting: Estimate ± SE = -0.065 ± 0.194, z = -0.336, p = 0.737; proximity: Estimate ± SE = -0.123 ± 0.158, z = -0.779, p = 0.436; gaze alternation: Estimate ± SE = 0.361 ± 0.201, z = 1.802, p = 0.071).
a weak trendp = 0.97319.5× alphagold
The increases in urinary tubular markers were not significantly associated with hemolysis or the number of PFA applications (Δα1MG vs ΔFree Hb: ρ = 0.033, p = 0.56; ΔNAG vs ΔFree Hb: ρ = 0.046, p = 0.41; pentaspline catheter count vs Δα1MG: ρ = 0.041, p = 0.61; pentaspline catheter count vs ΔNAG: ρ = –0.0606, p = 0.453; circular multielectrode array catheter count vs Δα1MG: ρ = 0.149, p = 0.0525 — showing a weak trend without statistical significance; circular multielectrode array catheter count vs ΔNAG: ρ = –0.0026, p = 0.973).