The USscore itself showed a trend toward significance but did not reach statistical independence (OR per point increase =1.21, 95% CI: 0.94–1.58; P=0.15).
← all phrases
“a trend toward significance”
In the literature
Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05, with a trend toward significance defined as 0.05≤P<0.15.
a trend toward significancep = .153
1b ) increased with disease severity with a trend toward significance (moderate, 1027.56 pg/mL; severe, 1136.92 pg/mL; critical, 1315.68 pg/mL, p = .153), and levels also rose post-tocilizumab (moderate, 1525 pg/mL, p = .011; severe, 1402.68 pg/mL, p = .046; critical, 1776.24 pg/mL, p = .0019).
a trend toward significanceP = .159
The multiple regression revealed that GT spurs ( P = .002) and AHI ( P = .032) were predictive of the Patte stage and statistically significant, whereas the acromial spur showed a trend toward significance ( P = .159) ( Table II ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.16
Education levels show a trend toward significance, with 60.0% of HBI OC participants having tertiary education compared to none in the HBI OV group ( p = 0.16).
a trend toward significancep = .16
Multivariate analysis in this setting showed a trend toward significance (HR 2.41, CI 95% 0.70–8.31, p = .16).
a trend toward significanceP = .16
Long‐rank test demonstrated a significant correlation between poor OS and a large number of distinct CGH segments in recurrent tumors ( P = .024) (Figure 3 A), and a trend toward significance for a high fraction of the genome altered in treatment‐naive tumors ( P = .16) (Figure 3 B).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.16
In the GDH/NAAT arm, the difference showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.16).
a trend toward significancep = 0.18
We observe a trend toward significance ( p = 0.18) but no significant difference in new RRT requirements between study groups.
a trend toward significanceP = 0.187
Achieving a pathologic complete response ( n = 10) to systemic therapy was associated with a favorable recurrence-free survival after resection, with a trend toward significance (HR, 0.345; 95% CI, 0.067–1.785; P = 0.187).
a trend toward significancep = 0.19
However, we observed a trend toward significance in OS with patients who experienced irAEs compared to those who did not experience irAEs (median 16.4 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.19, Figure 3 A).
a trend toward significancep < 0.2
Additionally, a trend toward significance ( p < 0.2) for T . gondii seropositive was noted for cats that were non-pedigree, had outdoor access, lived in a rural area, were PCR-positive for CMhm and PCR-positive for at least one feline vector borne pathogen (FVBP).
a trend toward significancep = 0.20
Combinational treatment showed significance in comparison to control by week five (p = 0.029), curcumin alone showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.20), and NSC treatment showed no significance (p = 0.55).
a trend toward significancep < 0.2
Any baseline patient demographics and surgery characteristics that showed significance or a trend toward significance ( p < 0.2) from univariate analysis were inputted into a binary regression analysis to determine which factors were most associated with the development of postoperative complications.
a trend toward significancep < 0.20
The multivariate logistic regression models included variables that showed statistical significance or a trend toward significance ( p < 0.20) in univariate analyses.
a trend toward significancep < 0.2
Variables that were statistically significant or had a trend toward significance ( p < 0.2) or were of a priori clinical significance were included in a multivariable analysis with forward stepwise ordinal logistic regression, to evaluate independent factors associated with medication non-adherence.
a trend toward significancep < 0.2
Variables with statistical significance or a trend toward significance (p < 0.2) were included in the multivariate analysis, which was performed using logistic regression to estimate the corresponding coefficients and odds ratios (ORs) for selected predictors.
a trend toward significancep < 0.2
A logistic regression model was conducted to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic variables that were either statistically significant in the univariate analysis ( p < 0.05) or demonstrated a trend toward significance ( p < 0.2), in order to identify potential risk factors associated with a reduction in PLT levels.
a trend toward significancep < 0.20
Significant predictors ( p < 0.05) or predictors showing a trend toward significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.20) based on univariate analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis.
a trend toward significanceP =0.20
We sought further replication of the two chromosome 1 regions in an additional set of cases and controls from the United States ( Table 1 , Supplementary Table 2 ); rs7412746 clearly replicated (OR=0.86, P =0.0076, one-sided; meta-analysis of all three replication cohorts OR=0.89, P =1.5 × 10 −5 ), with rs3219090 showing a trend toward significance in the expected direction (OR=0.95, P =0.20, one-sided; meta-analysis of all three replication cohorts OR=0.91, P = 3.4 × 10 −3 ).
a trend toward significanceP < 0.2
Univariable analysis showed that many variables had a trend toward significance ( P < 0.2) for association with the presence of individual, or groups of infectious agent(s) (Table 5 , Table 6 , Additional file 2 : Table S1, Additional file 3 : Table S2), and these were entered into the multivariable logistic regression analysis, together with variables having significant associations ( P ≤ 0.05).
a trend toward significancep = 0.2
A trend toward significance was observed also within the Ruminococcaceae family ( p = 0.2) CTRL 6.9% (5.5–8.3), LA 8.0% (6.7–9.4).
a trend toward significancep = 0.20
However, a trend toward significance was observed between cholesterol levels and SJ (p = 0.20), while no correlation was found between SJ/TJ and the other recorded metabolic parameters. 3.2.
a trend toward significancep <0.20
To determine independent correlates of pCR, variables with a trend toward significance on univariate testing ( p <0.20) were entered into a forward, stepwise multivariable logistic regression model ( p <0.05 for entry, p <0.10 for exit).
a trend toward significancep < 0.20
Factors with a trend toward significance ( p < 0.20) were initially considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis.