Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
There was a trend toward significance between C1 and C2 patients [Hazard for C1/C2: p = 0.08, HR: 0.51 (95%CI, 0.25–1.04)], while C3 patients had a significantly lower mOS compared to C2 [Hazard for C2/C3: p = 0.013, HR: 0.39 (95%CI, 0.14–1.09)] and obviously C1 [Hazard for C1/C3: p < 0.001, HR: 0.21 (95%CI, 0.06–0.70)] ( Figure 3B ).
a trend toward significanceP = .081.6× alpha
94) ( Table 3 ), nor was it associated with ICU admission (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.61–1.94, P = .78), 7-day readmission (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 0.51–4.67, P = .46), any metastatic complication (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.47–2.05, P = .94), or infective endocarditis (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.42–2.45, P = .96), but there was a trend toward significance for incidence of recurrent bacteremia (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 0.92–6.76, P = .08) ( Supplementary Tables 1–5 ).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.081.6× alpha
Therefore, although the SM mean for VIM common sequence (5.48 ± 5.58) was four times higher than that of NORM group (1.31 ± 0.86), due to the high intra-group standard deviations, no significant ( P > 0.05) differences were found and only a trend toward significance between NORM (1.31 ± 0.86) and WB groups (4.37 ± 3.36; P = 0.08; Figure 4B ) was observed.
a trend toward significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
However, total protein levels were significantly higher in the CTL group on the Day 40 of the sampling period ( p ≤ 0.05) and showed a trend toward significance on the Day 57 of the sampling period ( p = 0.08; Figure 3 C), with no differences observed on other dates ( p > 0.05).
a trend toward significanceP = .0801.6× alpha
Perceptions of DBS availability showed a trend toward significance in relation to knowledge scores ( P = .080), with higher scores among participants who responded “I don’t know” (mean = 5.13) or considered DBS “easily available” (mean = 4.88), compared to those who believed it was not available (mean = 4.12).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.081.6× alpha
At T3, maternal BMI positively correlated with the HBM: C20:3n-6 (r = 0.44, P < 0.001) and n-6/n-3 (r = 0.43, P < 0.001), had a trend toward significance with HBM: C18:3n-6 (r = 0.21, P = 0.08), and was inversely associated with C18:3n-3 (r = −0.42, P < 0.001) and n-3 PUFA (r = −0.41, P < 0.001).