Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = 0.0731.5× alpha
The intervention arm demonstrated a significant effect ( β = −1.20, SE = 0.35, p = 0.002), while age showed a trend toward significance ( β = −0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.073). 4.2.1.3 Heat threshold rating The regression model was not significant [ F (3,36) = 2.27, p = 0.097, R 2 = 0.16].
a trend toward significancep value = 0.0741.5× alpha
Comparison of Our Rs Correlations in Males and Females and with the Values Reported by Borghesi and Maroldi [ 7 ] There was a trend toward significance between the correlation coefficients calculated for males and females (Rs = 0.260 and Rs = 0.170, respectively) in our study; Z = 1.45, p value = 0.074.
a trend toward significancep = 0.0741.5× alpha
Perceptual matching task Both patients ( N = 7) and controls ( N = 6) had positive scores (1.098; SD : 0.28; 0.905; SD : 0.11), marginally greater for the patients' group, suggestive of a rightward bias, with some perceptual underestimation of left extent, with a trend toward significance (Mann-Whitney test: z = 1.79, p = 0.074).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0741.5× alpha
On multivariable analysis, only ASA score III or higher remained statistically associated with PSI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33–16.92, p = 0.016), though hematoma formation showed a trend toward significance (odds ratio [OR] = 6.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84–50.70, p = 0.074).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0741.5× alpha
When considering the mean rating of all self-location-related statements (S1–S3), the SS condition tended to be rated higher in 1PP-1PP (1.1) and 1PP-1PP-3PP (1.2) than in 3PP only (0.6) (Z = −1.46, p = 0.144; and Z = −1.79, p = 0.074, with a trend toward significance), suggesting that the absence of 1PP might weaken the illusion of a dual self-location.
a trend toward significancep = 0.0741.5× alpha
Follow up tests revealed that, while the control group did not change over time from pre to post and from post to retention, the experimental group showed a significant increase in the test from pre to post ( p < 0.001) and from pre to retention ( p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found from post to retention, although there was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.074).