Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The fixed‐effects estimates of the mixed model analysis (LMM) computed for the P1 component (Figure 6 ), with baseline located before S4, showed a trend toward significance effect for the interaction between the participant group and the type of trial (S or D) ( β = 0.27, SE = 0.14, t = 1.9, p = 0.06).
a trend toward significanceP =0.061.2× alpha
Facial expressions of pain (STEP test) Differences were mainly observed in the P[A]NM score (between faces expressing “moderate pain” and those expressing “no pain”) ( F [3,64] =3.09) ( P =0.03), and significant differences were found between the FM patients and the controls ( P =0.01), between the MS-P patients and the controls ( P =0.03), and with a trend toward significance between the MS-NP patients and the controls ( P =0.06).
a trend toward significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
In addition, we observed a trend toward significance in the alpha band ( p = 0.06). 3.6 Correlation of boost score between recording or stimulation and coagulation site Contact pairs involved in significantly changed connections following RFTC showed higher maximal correlation between either stimulation or recording boost score and coagulation site in the delta band (Figure 4B ). 3.7 CCEP reproducibility The mean percentage of significantly different connections between identical stimulation sessions was 10.26% (8.41%–13.26%).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
blast-saline: 0.320 ± 0.0 c/d, P < 0.001) with a trend toward significance at 10 months after blast injury that is not significantly different than in Sham mice (10 months: 0.450 ± 0.02 vs. blast-saline: 0.398 ± 0.0 c/d, P = 0.06; vs. sham-saline: 0.480 ± 0.01 c/d, P > 0.05).
a trend toward significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Here, the model was driven by the use of a walking aid (β = −0.30, p = 0.03) with lower STV in patients without walking aid compared to patients with a walking aid, with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.45, p = 0.0003, Figure 3B ), and a trend toward significance in the gender parameter with lower STV in women compared to men (β = −0.24, p = 0.06), with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.36, p = 0.005, Figure 3B ).