a trend toward significanceP = 0.060
There was a trend toward significance ( P = 0.060) for the participants ( n = 9) treated with antidiabetics at the start of ChEI treatment to exhibit also a shorter time spent in NHs.
There was a trend toward significance ( P = 0.060) for the participants ( n = 9) treated with antidiabetics at the start of ChEI treatment to exhibit also a shorter time spent in NHs.
The fixed‐effects estimates of the mixed model analysis (LMM) computed for the P1 component (Figure 6 ), with baseline located before S4, showed a trend toward significance effect for the interaction between the participant group and the type of trial (S or D) ( β = 0.27, SE = 0.14, t = 1.9, p = 0.06).
Analytic stage grouping showed a trend toward significance ( P = .060).
Although the admission CRP and platelet count did not remain associated on multivariable analysis, suggesting that male sex (which remained significant) affects these laboratory variables, we found a trend toward significance for admission CRP on multivariable analysis ( P = .06).
A greater proportion of participants in the CPA group than the placebo group showed a >10% decrease in average lesion size at week 3 ( P =0.05) and week 6 ( P =0.02) and showed a trend toward significance at week 12 ( P =0.06) ( Figure 4 ).
Adonis showed a significant difference with MSM status (unweighted p=0.002, weighted p=0.001) and a trend toward significance with HIV status (unweighted p =0.06; adonis with formula: distance matrix ~ MSM-status + HIV-status).
In DO mice, there was a trend toward significance for the interaction between all three factors (stress × sex × stimuli, F(1,95)=3.62, p = .06) because MSEW females spent less time in the zones that had been paired with social stimuli compared to other groups.
In terms of cognitive test performance, no between group differences emerged, though a trend toward significance was found for TMT A scores ( t (80) = −1.95, P = 0.06); see Table 4 .
Another parameter which was not significant in univariate analysis but was observed to show a trend toward significance ( P = .06) in linear regression analysis was N stage (nodal involvement).
There was a trend toward significance for larger changes in the follow instructions task, (β = 0.10, p = 0.06), but not for arithmetic, (β = -0.02, p = 0.827).
Framingham scores showed a trend toward significance for higher mean phase angle values in low-risk than high-risk patients [ß = -0.43 (95% CI -0.88 to 0.02), P = 0.06].
A post-hoc analysis of anatomy classification showed indistinguishable performance on real vs synthetic videos (with a trend toward significance, p = 0.06).
Facial expressions of pain (STEP test) Differences were mainly observed in the P[A]NM score (between faces expressing “moderate pain” and those expressing “no pain”) ( F [3,64] =3.09) ( P =0.03), and significant differences were found between the FM patients and the controls ( P =0.01), between the MS-P patients and the controls ( P =0.03), and with a trend toward significance between the MS-NP patients and the controls ( P =0.06).
In addition, we observed a trend toward significance in the alpha band ( p = 0.06). 3.6 Correlation of boost score between recording or stimulation and coagulation site Contact pairs involved in significantly changed connections following RFTC showed higher maximal correlation between either stimulation or recording boost score and coagulation site in the delta band (Figure 4B ). 3.7 CCEP reproducibility The mean percentage of significantly different connections between identical stimulation sessions was 10.26% (8.41%–13.26%).
incorrect trials differed for patients (Meng et al., 1992 ), and we found a trend toward significance ( z = −1.56, p = 0.06).
Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06) ( Supplementary Figure 1 ).
There was a trend toward significance with hematuria going down from 23 red blood cells per high-powered field to 11 red blood cells per high-powered field ( P = 0.06).
We found a trend toward significance between the three groups on OCDS total score (F(2,67) = 2.87, p = 0.06), and significant differences between groups on the obsessions subscale (F(2,67) = 3.22, p = 0.046).
Of note, analysis of additional predictors of extended LOS, patient sex demonstrated a trend toward significance, with female patients having a longer LOS than male patients (HR: 0.718 [0.509–1.015], P = 0.06).
blast-saline: 0.320 ± 0.0 c/d, P < 0.001) with a trend toward significance at 10 months after blast injury that is not significantly different than in Sham mice (10 months: 0.450 ± 0.02 vs. blast-saline: 0.398 ± 0.0 c/d, P = 0.06; vs. sham-saline: 0.480 ± 0.01 c/d, P > 0.05).
Here, the model was driven by the use of a walking aid (β = −0.30, p = 0.03) with lower STV in patients without walking aid compared to patients with a walking aid, with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.45, p = 0.0003, Figure 3B ), and a trend toward significance in the gender parameter with lower STV in women compared to men (β = −0.24, p = 0.06), with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.36, p = 0.005, Figure 3B ).
Paired t -test demonstrated a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06, Fig. 5c ).
Accordingly, LVEDD and LVESV reductions from baseline were statistically significant only in patients younger than 6 years ( p = 0.038 and p = 0.007, respectively), whereas LVEDV showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).
There was a trend toward significance with the mTBI+BE group displaying thinner cortices than the mTBI-BE group for the right SFG [ F (1, 74) = 3.65, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05].
pylori-negative patients (35.4%), with a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).