Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

RNase1 targets specific subsets of tumor-infiltrating immune cells Consistent with the above data based on the t-SNE-guided stratification (Figure 2 ), a conventional hand-gated strategy ( Figure S3 ) showed that RNase1 increased the frequency of the CD4 + T cell subset by greater than two-fold and the CD8 + T cell subset with a trend toward significance (Figure 3 A and 3 B).
The present study revealed a significant correlation between the WHO 2004 grade of urothelial carcinoma cases and the immunohistochemical expression of CA19.9 ( P value was 0.021), CA19.9 was over expressed immunohistochemically in low-grade urothelial carcinoma than in high-grade tumors, and these results were supported by studies done by Chuang and Liao[ 8 ] and Kajiwara et al .,[ 15 ] on the other hand no significant correlation was found between immunohistochemical scoring of CA19.9 and the WHO 2004 grade of urothelial carcinoma cases; despite that there was a trend toward significance ( P value 0.06) in which moderate and strong immunohistochemical scoring of CA19.9 was found more in low-grade tumors while negative staining was associated with high-grade tumors, taking in consideration that to the best of this knowledge; this study is the only study in which the 2004 grading system of urothelial carcinoma had been used in evaluating CA19.9 immunohistochemical expression.
Stimulation of THP1 cells with PMA/LPS upregulated the expression (>1.5-fold as compared to control) of total 28 gene transcripts, including CXCL8 (IL8), IL1B, CXCL6, IL1RN, NOS2, RIPK2, BCL6, and ITGB2 with a P value of <0.05, and of CCL5 and TNF in a trend toward significance ( Table 1 ).
Statistically significant differences at the level of α ≤ 0.01 were observed only in the experimental group for maximum pain during the last week and maximum pain while sitting (>30 min), whereas a trend toward significance was noted for current pain (α′ = 0.05/2 = 0.025; p for VAS1 = 0.0277) ( Table 7 ).