Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
In women, there was a significant association between low relative STS power and hip fractures (OR = 3.25, 95%CI: 1.07–9.86; p = 0.038), and a strong trend towards an association with falls (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 0.98–1.95; p = 0.065) and all-types of fractures (OR = 1.40, 95%CI: 0.98–1.99; p = 0.061) ( Fig. 3 B). 3.3 Comparison of hospitalizations and all-cause mortality between older adults with low and normal relative STS power Older men with low relative STS power showed a tendency towards a higher cumulative hospitalization incidence compared to those with normal relative STS power (62.6% vs. 56.5%, respectively; p = 0.077) ( Fig. 4 A).
a strong trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
However, for irritability, while both groups had similar rates of decline during time interval 1, the group starting antidopaminergic medication displayed a strong trend for a reduced rate of increase in post-medication (t (78)=1.872, p = 0.065), which meant that they had a significantly lower average increase than the matched control group during time interval 2 (F (1, 175)=10.061, p = 0.002) (see figure 2C ).
a strong trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
At 28 days post 2nd mRNA-1273 vaccination, a strong trend to a lower Spike S1-specific IgG concentration was observed in older adults compared to young adults (p = 0.065) (geometric mean IgG concentration in BAU/mL (95% CI): YA = 2587.8 (2203.9–3038.5), MA = 2217.9 (1874.5–2623.3), and OA = 1832.3 (1513.5–2218.3)) (Fig. 4A ).
a strong trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
To estimate whether the weaker synaptic strength of D1-MSNs onto GAD2(–) could be explained by lower GABA release probability, we quantified paired-pulse ratios in response to four different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and found a strong trend toward higher ISIs for D1-MSN to GAD2(–) synapses ( Fig. 1 D , left; F (1,81) = 3.486, p = 0.065, cell type, two-way ANOVA).