Statistical significance was determined at α = 0.05, and because of the small sample sizes for some of the variables a statistical trend was determined at α = 0.10.
← all phrases
“a statistical trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Based on the results of this study, a statistical trend is observed, regarding the effect of allicin at a dose of 200 μg/kg, showing a decrease in Clostridium spp. contamination.
Although as well as a nonsignificant interaction between tDCS and AD risk factors, there was a statistical trend toward an interaction between tDCS and the APOE ε4-allele, possibly attributable to increased aMPFC DC after tDCS application in MCI patients with Aβ deposits, yielding a large effect size ( p = 0.056, partial η 2 = 0.138, Figure 1 A).
P-values of 0.05–0.1 were considered as a statistical trend.
Affective network At the whole brain level, we observed a statistical trend for a reduction in functional connectivity between the sgACC seed region and the right dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) following ketamine administration compared to placebo (n = 17, paired t-test: p uncorr <0.001, extent threshold of k>13, resulting in a cluster-level p corr <0.1; Fig. 4 ).
Comparison between pre- and post-transfusion echocardiographic parameters LA volume and PAPs showed a statistical trend towards increasing after blood transfusion.
Furthermore, there was a statistical trend towards a negative rather than towards a positive relationship between AVT levels and submission.
A P-value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant and a P-value < 0.1 was defined as a statistical trend.
Plasma levels of LCN2 and MMP-7 were significantly higher in the validation ICU group compared with the validation home group, whereas a statistical trend was observed for HGF ( Supplemental Figure 4A ).
Results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 and a statistical trend was defined as p value between 0.05 and 0.1.
In fact, this technique rearranges rows and columns to create a statistical trend from the dataset. 3.6.
Spectrum-STI ( http://avenirhealth.org/software-spectrum.php ) is a statistical trend estimation model developed by Avenir Health, with support from the World Health Organization (WHO), for use by national health officials to synthesize STI surveillance data and generate national trend estimates.
Interestingly, we found that MTHFD1/2 inhibition substantially increased infarct size in intact WT female hearts (Figure 5A,B ), but this increase was not statistically significant, as we only observed a statistical trend.
A statistical trend was observed for the group treated with BND-22 +anti-PD-1 in comparison to the isotype control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons; p=0.0586).
The relationship between promoter hypermethylation and OS demonstrated a statistical trend that did not reach significance.
On the contrary, a mixed diagnosis male suicide attempter group (adjustment disorder, personality disorder, MDD, schizophrenia) showed lower testosterone levels than controls; with a significant difference in schizophrenic patients and a statistical trend in MDD patients (both diagnosis groups revealed lower testosterone levels than controls).
P < 0.05 was regarded as representing statistical significance, and P -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered to represent a statistical trend.
Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and a statistical trend was declared at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10. 2.3.2 Stress response during the treatment phase Polynomial regression was used to analyze the effect of the targeted pain management protocol by describing the dependence of the cortisol concentration on time (min).
47% of participants improving appetite across the study and all metrics exhibiting a statistical trend in the direction of improvement.
A statistical trend towards prolonged perineal pain in the adjustable male sling group could be observed.
Significance level was set at 0.05; p values < 0.1 were considered to indicate a statistical trend.
In contrast to the M stage, which retained statistical significance, only a statistical trend was detected for the two patient clusters.
Across DSQ subgroups there are statistically significant differences in FIS and COMPASS 31 scores, and there was a statistical trend for a monotonic increase of self-reported cognitive impairment with increased DSQ category.
We also observed a statistical trend, also in the delta band, towards identifying patients most likely to respond to active iTBS.
In our primary hypothesis testing, we assessed a statistical trend for raw EDIP scores with cohort (sex)‐specific ceilings at 5th and 95th percentile values to eliminate outlier effects.