“a statistical trend”

However, an interesting numerical difference supported by a statistical trend was found between sexes in the codeine containing paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg ( p = 0.10) and ibuprofen 400 mg/paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg ( p = 0.14) groups where females score numerically higher SPI than males (Table 1 ).

Variables with a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) in a univariable model were included in the final multivariable model.

The linear term remained significant if we removed group BWE, KUY, or UGE; it became a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.10) if we removed group INS, ISA, NTA, TIT, or URU; and the p-value increased to 0.57 if we removed the largest group.

Improvements were seen in the items on friendships (mean = 1.39; SD = 0.5 to mean = 1.65; SD = 0.49; p = 0.05) and as a statistical trend on employment (mean = 2.78; SD = 3.07 to mean = 3.45; SD = 3.08; p = 0.10), whilst there was no significant difference on the items assessing accommodation and partnership.

Similarly, significance was always stated at p < 0.05 (while p < 0.1 was considered as a statistical trend). 3.

To determine the effect of any single patient variable compared to others, logistic regression was performed, and significance ( p < 0.05) or a statistical trend ( p < 0.10) was established.

Vascular burden factors showing a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) of prediction of increased IMT were included in the VBI.

A statistical trend ( p < 0.10) was found for higher RMS sway in the no FXTAS group than controls in the following five additional conditions: (1) FTEO ST, firm ( p = 0.0795), (2) FTEC ST, firm ( p = 0.0706, (3) FAEC DT, firm ( p = 0.076), (4) FTEO DT, firm ( p = 0.0682), and (5) FTEO, foam ( p = 0.0537).

Parameters showing a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) or being proved a significant association in previous studies were included in a logistic model to identify parameters independently associated with functional outcome.

Vision showed a statistical trend for improvement after treatment ( P = 0.1, Wilcoxon singed rank test).

A statistical trend was accepted with a p value of 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1 and indicated in the figures with the symbol “T”.

In addition, metabolites 28 (putatively assigned to glutamate-proline) and 25 showed a statistical trend (0.05<p<0.1) but again only when using uncorrected p-values.

Relative to the morning group, Nap 1 start time was significantly later for the neither group ( β = 0.16, SE = 0.06, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.29], p = 0.01), with a statistical trend WWtowards a later start time observed in the evening group ( β = 0.14, SE = 0.08, 95% CI = [−0.03, 0.30], p < 0.1) (Figure S5 ).

In all statistical analyses, significance criterion alpha for all test was 0.05 and a statistical trend was declared when P < .1.

There was also a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.10) of a negative relationship between CS and transformed ppFEV 1 results ( r (69) = − 0.177, p = 0.06).

Independent variables were selected through a two-step process: (1) variables with a statistical trend ( P < 0.1) in univariate logistic regression analysis were included as candidates; (2) additional clinically relevant factors identified from previous literature were also incorporated (e.g., duration of disease).

The significance of linear and quadratic responses was declared at p < 0.05 and a statistical trend was considered for 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

Dividing the time spent in the chamber in two blocks of 5 min showed a statistical trend (Figure 3A ; 0–5 min: p < 0.1; 6–10 min: p < 0.1).

For rs895819, only a statistical trend of significance (0.05 P<0.1) was reached for a recessive genetic model of association with asthenoteratozoospermia.

Dysarthria was statistically significantly worsened at week 80 compared to baseline, whereas there was only a statistical trend (p = 0.10) for dysphagia at week 80 compared to baseline.

There was also a statistical trend (p < 0.1) between MPR values for patients with poor outcome and the deceased (Fig. 2 a–c).

A similar, albeit not statistically significant result was found for the severe multifocal lesions group where differences were only showing a statistical trend (Wilcoxon signed-rank test Z = 1.5, P = 0.1; Fig. 5D ).

oxBS confirmed the increase in 5hmC in depressed brains in myosin XVI (MYO16) at position 109 344 927 ( P =0.033) and a statistical trend towards increased 5hmC at the neighboring CpG position 109 344 932 ( P =0.10; Figure 2b ).

Multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed for variables showing a statistical trend ( P < 0.1) to identify which of those variables were independently correlated with anxiety.

36 38 41 43 44 The regression test was significant at P≤0.05 in four meta-analyses (D, G, H, M) 16 37 39 42 and showed a statistical trend in another two (P≤0.10, A, L). 44 45 In five funnel plots, the contours to distinguish between areas of significance and non-significance at P=0.05 suggested missing trials in areas of non-significance (A, C, D, H, L). 16 42 44 45 46 The weighted average of asymmetry coefficients across all meta-analyses was −1.79 (−2.81 to −0.78).