Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a statistical trend”

2,799 sentences · 2,799 papers · 4,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a statistical trendP=0.0781.6× alphagold
Exploring results related to single-items, we observed a statistically significant result for the item ‘ Unable to generate sufficient momentum to move therapy with a client in a constructive direction ’ ( t = –2.04, P=0.035) and a statistical trend for the item ‘ Unable to have much real empathy for a client’s experiences ’ ( t = –1.83, P=0.078).
a statistical trendp = 0.07811.6× alphagold
Effects of 6-month esketamine treatment on neurofilament serum levels As shown in Figure 3 , Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistical trend toward lower sNfL levels after 6 months of treatment with esketamine (14.67 ± 1.64 versus 12.14 ± 1.51, p = 0.0781).
a statistical trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
The selected treatment schedule (SBRT and 3D-CRT) did not statistically significantly influence the risk of local progression ( Figure 2 C, log-rank test p = 0.55), while GTV and PTV showed a statistical trend (log-rank: GTV > median: p = 0.079; PTV > median p = 0.060).
a statistical trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
When trials with reproductions three SD above the mean were discarded, there was a statistical trend for a quadratic relationship between the temporal reproductions and nosepoke rate ( p = 0.079).
Mice monitor their timing errors.
Sci Rep · 2024 · PMC11458620
a statistical trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Post hoc univariate analyses showed that females (n = 163) scored significantly higher than males (n = 162) in the EC subscale (M f = 28.63 vs M m = 25.77; F 1,320 = 10.472; p<0.005), and a statistical trend in the same direction was observed in the PD subscale (M f = 19.32 vs M m = 17.44; F 1,320 = 3.108; p = 0.079), while there were no differences in the PT subscale (M f = 25.89 vs M m = 24.12; F 1,320 = 1.165; p = 0.281) and in the FS subscale (M f = 24.49 vs M m = 22.45; F 1,320 = 2.368; p = 0.125; Figure 1 ).