“a statistical trend”

In the univariate analysis, smaller FCD volumes showed a statistical trend of being correlated with higher AI values after controlling for age at MRI (Spearman’s correlation: − 0.48, p = 0.05, Fig. 2 B), whereas other epilepsy-related or lesion-related features were not related to AI values (Table 4 ).

At follow-up, ANC and ALC, serum ferritin, CRP and plasma D-dimer values showed a statistical trend towards their reference ranges ( p > 0.05 for all), while serum LDH declined significantly (1096 ± 379 vs. 522 ± 214 UI/L, p = 0.02). 3.4.

This miRNA showed a differential expression only with a statistical trend ( p = 0.05) in our study, but had to be excluded from some statistical approaches due to its low expression levels. miR-183, which was better performing in our cohort than miR-96, also emerged as a possible marker for high-grade NMIBC in the report from Pardini et al., who identified promising diagnostic miRNAs by NGS in cell-free urine supernatants from BCa patients and control subjects [ 45 ].

Furthermore, the weight of the animals was controlled, and it was found that there was a statistical trend of lower weight in those mice in the CTR group compared to the rest of the groups ( p > .05).

Our analysis revealed that nematode presence is significantly associated with high apple pH and shows a statistical trend (i.e., 0.1 < P < .05) for low maximum temperature of the environment ( Fig. 6A and B ; Table S27 and 28 ).

In this sense, paired individuals showed higher levels of LTMO in prepandemic context (study 1 and study 2) (M = 5.64, SE = 0.08) compared to face-to-face panstudy (M = 4.93, SE = 0.11; mean differences = 0.71, SE = 0.13, p < 0.001) and a statistical trend was found for the online panstudy (M = 5.29, SE = 0.12; mean differences = 0.36, SE = 0.15, p = 0.050).

In the SPR experiments, a statistical trend was considered to be statistically significant if its p -value was 1 > p > 0.05.

showed a statistical trend of risk reduction associated with the use of either TZDs (relative risk 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.00, P =0.050) or metformin (relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.01, P =0.064) [ 11 ].

LDL particle concentration showed a statistical trend suggesting increasing particle concentration with increasing hemoglobin levels ( r = 0.08; p = 0.05).

If at least one feature significantly differed across chemical concentrations as indicated by the ANOVA test (at least one DEG), data were then subjected to a statistical trend test (Williams’ Trend Test; p < 0.05; 100 permutations; Supplementary Table S.3 , Step 2).

Intermediate-colored nodes indicate exploratory findings with large effect sizes (uncorrected p < 0.01 and |Cohen’s d | > 0.8), whereas light-colored nodes indicate regions with moderate effect sizes showing a statistical trend (uncorrected p < 0.05 and |Cohen’s d| > 0.5).

P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and a statistical trend was recognized for P values of 0.1 ≥ P ≥ 0.05.

In univariate logistic regression analysis, thickness and stranding of the SMA fat sheath were significant predictors of S-status, while stranding of the fat plane between ICV and pancreas reached a statistical trend ( P = 0.05).

A p -value less than 0.1 was considered as a statistical trend and p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

There was a statistical trend associating a higher Clichy score (2 or 3/3) with RI ( p = 0.05).

There were no differences in menopause status or type of AET used when hot flashes were categorized subjectively, but there was a statistical trend for women with objective hot flashes to be premenopausal ( P = 0.05) and to be treated with leuprolide ( P = 0.08).

At 14 dpi, dynamics shifted and WT mice showed a statistical trend towards an increase of TNF-α mRNA expression compared to CLEC12A −/− mice ( p = 0.05, Fig. 4 A), likely related to prolonged virus infection in WT mice.

Significant values were established at p < 0.05, while a statistical trend was declared when one indicator was significant and the other one was not (e.g., p > 0.05 and Cohen’s d ≥ 0.2).

Based on these data a statistical trend analysis was performed using linear regression, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Living alone had a statistical trend of association with a lower probability of displaying mild, moderate, or severe impairment as measured by the Blessed Dementia Scale (OR = 0.52, p = 0.05) as well as with a lower probability of having cognitive impairment or suspected cognitive impairment as measured by the MMSE (OR = 0.57, p = 0.07).

A statistical trend was declared when one indicator was significant and the other one was not (e.g., p > 0.05 and Cohen’s d ≥ 0.2).

Specifically, in individuals with sporadic SVD, it was linked to 0.10-SD better performance in processing speed at follow-ups, which showed a statistical trend when adjusted for age, sex, education, VRF score and SVD markers (Cohort 1: standardized β = 0.10, FDR-corrected p = 0.05; Table 2 ).

Significance level was set at α = 0.05 and a statistical trend was indicated by 0.1 > p > 0.05.

When excluding these three patients there is a statistical trend towards higher interictal BDNF levels compared with inside-attack BDNF concentrations ( P = 0.05).

P- values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and a statistical trend was recognised for p- values of 0.1 ≥ P ≥ 0.05.