Nevertheless, after the consumption of test meals, a question was added into the VAS questionnaire about how well the participants liked the test food; results exhibited that, despite a statistical trend, liking of the test meals were similar and none of the participants mentioned that the test foods were unpleasant.
← all phrases
“a statistical trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In accordance with the previous literature (Table 6 ), the present study confirms the predictive value of the preoperative lactate levels and the occurrence of postoperative acute kidney injury, whereas the need of intraoperatory adrenergic vasopressors and the ICRM score showed only a statistical trend.
[20] found a statistical trend regarding a relevant influence of long-term glycemic control in another retrospective work, the prospective multi-center study by Creta et al.
A statistical trend was also observed for component 4.
A statistical trend was also observed for the other weeks of treatment, though this difference was not statistically significant, likely due to small sample sizes.
There was however a statistical trend for the OBE group to be more likely to endorse ‘eating alone’ than those in the SBE.
The 4-year RT-CILR was 0% for patients who achieved GTR, versus 14.8% for those with less than GTR ( P = .0961), representating a statistical trend for increased RT-CILR with less than GTR.
A statistical trend towards prognostic significance was reached for differentiation grade, p53 protein expression status and age.
A statistical trend was found for the forced vital capacity (FVC) to increase among patients treated with bermekimab (5 out of 10 patients compared to 2 out of 10 treated with placebo; p: 0.054 by the binomial test).
A significant difference in the MD values between the moderate TBI and control groups was noted in the left uncinate fasciculus, left posterior thalamic radiation, and left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, with a statistical trend noted in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus.
In our analysis, we considered p values between 0.05 and 0.1 as indicative of a statistical trend.
p -values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant, while p -values of <0.10 were considered as a statistical trend considering the size of the sample.
For all 14 BS together, this difference only reached the level of a statistical trend for overall prevalence and the frequency requirement ( Table 3 ).
However, in the on-med/pre-DBS condition these relationships only exhibited a statistical trend (Fig. 1 a).
Crucially, the significant two-way interactions were qualified by a statistical trend for a three-way interaction between the response type contrast false alarms − fast hits, word valence, and group ( Table 3 ).
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and 0.05 < P < 0.1 was considered a statistical trend. 3.
The cognitive component of alexithymia did not significantly predict subjective QoL in HFASD, but there was a statistical trend in the expected direction, that is, that fewer cognitions about emotional arousal lead to lower subjective QoL in HFASD.
For rs17047731, we still found a statistical trend; however, for rs12623648 and rs9308762, we found no association in our study.
Statistical results with P values between 0.05 and 0.1 are described as a statistical trend.
Distal tibia fractures were chosen due to the high prevalence of infections in this type of injuries, which warrants a particular benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis and thus might allow to see a statistical trend in favor of the coated product.
Adjusted p -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were interpreted as indicative of a statistical trend, particularly given the small sample size.
A statistical trend was considered for p < 0.10. 3.
A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a 0.05 ≤ p -value < 0.1 was considered a statistical trend. 3.
Statistical significance was declared at p ≤ 0.05, while values between 0.05 and 0.10 were interpreted as a statistical trend.
There was a significant main effect of pharmacological treatment for FAR and a statistical trend towards a main effect of pharmacological treatment for HR, both resulting from higher values for both parameters after oxytocin than after placebo (FAR: Placebo, 0.26; Oxytocin, 0.37; F (1,45) = 5.131, p = 0.028, η p 2 = 0.102; HR: Placebo, 0.61; Oxytocin, 0.69; F (1,45) = 2.89, p = 0.096, η p 2 = 0.060).