Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Therefore, the aforementioned facts highlight a significant trend towards the plant-based vaccine industry to make big strides in the next decade, which will likely drive the development, improvement, pre-clinical and clinical testing, and market entry of plant-made vaccines for NDDs, as well as for other highly prevalent human illnesses. 3.
While the placebo group experienced an additional elevation of BPP at the end of the exercise, supplemented subjects exhibited a decrease, reaching the basal level they had 60 min before; at 11.4 mmHg ( p = 0.095), the difference between both groups represents a significant trend.
This cumulative effect was further supported when combined individuals with one or two PD-susceptible genotypes (OR = 2.53, 95%CI = 1.21–5.27, p = 0.0165), and those with three or four susceptible genotypes (OR = 3.93, 95%CI = 1.83–8.43, p = 0.0004), with a significant trend across subgroups ( p for trend = 0.0009, Table 5 ).
There is also an interaction effect ( P < .001) between time and treatment effects for fecal characteristics, difficulty in defecation, defecation time, sensation of incomplete evacuation, frequency of bowel movements, bloating, total score of clinical symptoms, as well as the physiological, psychological, satisfaction, and total scores of the PAC-QOL scale, indicating a significant trend of change over time with respect to these symptoms and dimensions in both groups.
Discussion In the entire study population, we found that free T 4 level was inversely associated with prevalent CHD and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, and there was a significant trend of association of thyroid function categories with prevalent CHD, with lower thyroid function indicating increased risk of CHD.
After full adjustment (Model 3), the gradient persisted (Q2 HR 1.45, p = 0.113; Q3 HR 2.16, p < 0.001; Q4 HR 2.76, p < 0.001), with a significant trend across quartiles (p for trend < 0.001). 365-day mortality risk Continuous CAR Per-unit increments in CAR were linked to a 24–63% increased risk of mortality (Model 1: HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; Model 2: HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.38–1.79; Model 3: HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07–1.43; all p ≤ 0.004).