Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Therefore, replacing a list of additives with a few natural ingredients that collect all the properties necessary to stabilize foods, would move UPFs away from the term “ultra” and wash them to be “clean.” Thus, there is a significant trend toward the consumption of products with a clean label which is driving food researchers and technologists to explore new “natural” ingredients and processes for the preparation of novel foods.
Additionally, mGluR5 ( ρ = −0.0714, p = 0.0371) and D1 ( ρ = 0.0787, p = 0.0369) receptor maps showed a significant trend but did not meet the threshold for significance after FDR correction ( p FDR‐corrected = 0.0226) (Figure 5 and Table 2 ). 3.4 Validation Analysis To validate the robustness and reproducibility of our results, we used different maps of the same neurotransmitter receptor/transporter to replicate the spatial correlation analysis described above.
4–6 But there is a concern that there is a significant trend towards increased FA resistance among Staphylococci with increased duration of use, which is an even greater problem for limiting our therapeutic options. 1 , 7 Fusidic acid inhibits elongation factor G (EF-G) release from ribosomes and eventually blocks the synthesis of bacterial proteins. 8 As in
If we take a closer look at the ORs for both the n–6/n–3 ratio and n–6 at 1 y of age in the problem-solving domain where there is a significant trend, only the highest quintile for the n–6/n–3 ratio showed a significant increased risk; n–6 showed a reduced risk from the second through to the highest quintile, and the ORs are similar (in other words, the lowest quintile for n–6 showed the increased risk).
The following observations may be drawn from data analysis: (1) plasma nitrate + nitrite significantly raised during treatment (P = 0.0226 for t0 vs t3), but statistical significance was retained only when cycles administered with IL-2 18 MIU m-2 day-1 are considered (P = 0.0329 for t0 vs t3; P = 0.0354 for t0 vs t2 vs t4) (dose-dependent pattern); (2) during subsequent cycles a significant trend toward a progressive increase of plasma nitrate + nitrite levels, with increasing cumulative dose of IL-2, was observed (linear regression coefficient r = 0.62, P = 0.0141 for t0; r = 0.80, P = 0.0003 for t1; r = 0.62, P = 0.013 for t2; r = 0.69, P = 0.045 for t3); (3) plasma nitrate + nitrite levels peaked earlier in subsequent cycles than in the first cycle; (4) all patients experienced hypotension.