Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

However, when we allow the slope of the relationship between relative brain mass and pathwise rate to vary among orders (that is, test to see whether the trend is the same among mammalian orders), we find a significant trend in only three orders: rodents ( β = 0.998, P x = 0.002), carnivores ( β = 1.845, P x = 0.000) and, most strikingly, primates ( β = 2.074, P x = 0.000) (Fig. 3 ).
Compared to mi-TA, among eligible studies, mi-PA showed a significant trend over reduced mean operative time, despite being within a large retrospective cohort; Walz et al. reported no significant differences in terms of this variable when considering all adrenal benign masses amenable of surgical treatment [ 14 ].
7 Key Messages These findings suggest systemic inflammation as a potential mechanism through which UPF consumption negatively affects children's health A significant trend was found between UPF consumption and IL ‐1β levels across increasing tertiles of intake, indicating a dose‐response relationship Age may influence the inflammatory response to UPFs , with IL ‐6 levels significantly associated with UPF intake among children aged 9 years and older.
A significant trend was observed (Fig. 1 ) in PALTEA and PALFAMS, 4b group made less errors as compared to 4a, indicating there was more enhancement in visual PAL and decrement of TSH levels after 10 years of LT-4 treatment in SCH population.
The result for MCPyV differed according to glioma subtype (Supplemental Table S1 ): for GBM, ORs rose with increasing tertile (OR for tertile 3 vs seronegativity: 1.80 (95% CI 1.03–3.15) with a significant trend ( p -value trend = 0.048), whereas for nonGBM, the OR was significantly elevated only in the first tertile (OR for tertile 1 vs seronegativity: 2.11 (95% CI 1.06–4.19) and declined with increasing tertile (OR for tertile 3 vs seronegativity:1.29 (95% CI 0.59–2.81) with a nonsignificant trend ( p -value trend = 0.575).