Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP = .40388.1× alphagold
Compared to patients who did not resume therapy after a pause, those who did resume therapy had a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS (HR = 0.517, CI: 0.110-2.436, P = .4038; Figure S1 , see online supplementary material for a color version of this figure).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.428.4× alphagold
Multicenter trials of mortality within 30 days demonstrated a neutral effect (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.06; P = 0.13; I 2 = 0%), whereas single-center studies suggested a nonsignificant trend toward benefit (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.20–1.95; P = 0.42; I 2 = 39%) (Supplemental Digital Content Table 5A, available at: http://links.lww.com/MS9/B74 ).
a nonsignificant trendP value=0.438.6× alphagold
Patients with PASP/LVSV ≥1.0 mm Hg/mL were more likely to require respiratory support using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (46.4% versus 22.3%, P value <0.001) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased mechanical ventilation (19.6% versus 15.5%, P value=0.43).
a nonsignificant trendP = .448.8× alphagold
The colony-forming abilities of the 2N population were higher compared with the 4N population in all treatment groups (5 μM nutlin-3 alone, 5 μM nutlin-3 plus RT for LPS853 and T778; P value ≤.05) with a nonsignificant trend in the RT alone group (LPS853; P = .44, T778; P = .08).
a nonsignificant trendP =0.448.8× alphagold
Cylinder vector analysis Cylinder vector analysis revealed a nonsignificant trend toward overcorrection post-ufCXL compared with pre-ufCXL ( Figure 4A , Correction Index: 1.10±0.67 vs. 0.83±0.33, respectively; P =0.44) and an increased index of success (IOS) post-ufCXL compared with pre-ufCXL (IOS: 0.86±1.12 vs. 0.58±0.52, respectively; P =0.45).
a nonsignificant trendP =0.4689.4× alphagold
The prevalence of subclinical cerebrovascular disease did not differ significantly among the intensive, less intensive, and uncontrolled SBP groups, although a nonsignificant trend was present (12.8% versus 18.7% versus 20.8% [ P =0.468] for SBI; 17.0% versus 22.5% versus 30.8% [ P =0.076] for the upper quartile of log‐WMHV) (Figure 2 A and 2 B).
a nonsignificant trendP = .51110.2× alphagold
The modified Mason–Allen stitch was, however, associated with better functional outcomes at the final follow-up, with a significantly improved Walch–Duplay score (87.2 vs 82.0; P = .035) and Rowe score (respectively 86.8 vs 76.3; P = .001) and a nonsignificant trend for a lower failure rate with, respectively, 6% and 10% ( P = .511).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.51510.3× alphagold
Interestingly, while our adjusted Cox regression models demonstrated significant associations between CTI and all-cause mortality, the unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis showed only a nonsignificant trend ( p = 0.515).