Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP = 0.29185.8× alphagold
The percentage of potential T-cell responses achieved in each category revealed a nonsignificant trend toward higher responses among ACPA + RA patients to the created peptides (33%) than to no change (17%; P = 0.2918) and destroyed (13%; P = 0.1692) peptide groups, in addition to significantly more frequent responses among ACPA + RA patients to the created peptides (33%) than observed for the controls by χ 2 test (2.5%; P = 0.0002; Fig. 6b ).
a nonsignificant trendp = .3116.2× alphagold
This interaction reflected the finding that right-hand responses were more accurate when pressing the lower key than when pressing the upper key, t (79) = −2.992, p = .004, d = −0.335 (two-tailed test, while a nonsignificant trend in the opposite direction occurred for left-hand responses, t (79) = 1.019, p = .311, d = −0.114 (two-tailed test).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.326.4× alphagold
There was a nonsignificant trend toward a decrease in the median sodium fractional excretion after dDAVP injection in patients affected by central diabetes insipidus, from 1.22% to 0.44% ( P = 0.32) and remained stable in patients affected by nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (1.42% to 1.39%, P = 0.32, Fig. 1 ).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.326.4× alphagold
Interestingly, when comparing GPNMB levels across different disease stages within the same cognitive status groups, we observed a nonsignificant trend toward higher levels in patients with advanced-stage PD than in patients with early-stage PD (PD-NC: 24.21 ± 0.82 vs. 25.77 ± 1.48, p = 0.32; PD-CI: 30.22 ± 0.93 vs. 31.16 ± 1.42, p = 0.56).