Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP = .12.0× alphagold
11 , 12 , 13 It showed a nonsignificant trend toward the reduction of PMI (4.3% vs 1.4%; P = .1) and bleeding complications (6.6% vs 2.8%; P = .2) in the last group, which, due to the small sample size and the observational nature of the study, does not allow for any definitive conclusions to be drawn.
a nonsignificant trendP =0.12.0× alphagold
Finally, while in‐patient death was similar between groups with a nonsignificant trend favoring DTT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.28–1.14]; P =0.1), the rate of good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) at discharge was higher among DTT patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.02–3.45]; P =0.045) without any significant difference in the rate of 90‐day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.74–2.13]; P =0.4; Table 2 ).
a nonsignificant trendP =0.12.0× alphagold
Despite the small size of the high miR-3151 expressers in the FAVmol subgroup ( n =6 out of 50), high levels of miR-3151 were also associated with shorter OS (5-year OS: 33±38 vs 70±12% P =0.046) ( Figure 2d ), with a nonsignificant trend for LFS ( P =0.1).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.102.0× alphagold
Finally, considering only AML patients ( n = 47), higher M‐MDSC levels were associated with a higher risk of relapse, confirmed in multivariate analysis (HR: 4.30 [95%CI: 1.20–15.48], p = 0.025; Figure 3A ), while there was a nonsignificant trend for lower DFS (3‐year DFS: 33% vs. 65%, p = 0.10; Figure 3B ). 3.3.
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.102.0× alphagold
noted in LAAC cases with 3D ICE, there was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter procedural times from the initial 20 cases (42.7 ± 7.7 minutes) to the remaining 34 patients (39.6 ± 6.3 minutes; p = 0.10). 50 Some authors have assessed that comfort levels can increase after a training period estimated as 10 to 15 cases for electrophysiology studies. 51 Pros and Cons The catheter is single-use and costs for 2D ICE can be ∼2500 USD, whereas costs for 3D ICE could be close to 4000 USD.
a nonsignificant trendp < 0.102.0× alphagold
Improvements in depressive symptoms following seltorexant (but not placebo and diphenhydramine) however, showed a nonsignificant trend toward a positive correlation with improvement in SE ( p < 0.10); neither changes in WASO nor in duration of stage 2 sleep correlated with improvements in depressive symptoms in any treatment group.
a nonsignificant trendP = .12.0× alphagold
In these analyses, the overall bias was minimal, yet we observed a nonsignificant trend toward smaller bias in the case of longer and larger devices: –0.17 ± 0.47 vs –0.05 ± 0.54 ( P = .1, t test) for stent length ≥30 mm vs <30 mm, respectively and 0.01 ± 0.45 vs –0.09 ± 0.32 ( P = .2, t test) for MSA ≥6 mm 2 vs MSA <6 mm 2 , respectively.
a nonsignificant trendP < 0.102.0× alphagold
A nonsignificant trend ( P < 0.10) of caffeine use was observed for alcohol user.[ 17 ] The review of studies demonstrated that high caffeine intake was associated with psychotic and manic symptoms or exacerbation of previous psychotic symptoms.[ 18 ] Research suggested that excessive caffeine intake might hamper the recovery of patients with bipolar disorder or manic-type mood episodes.