Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
The significant shift away from progenitors in animals exposed to SE was mirrored by a nonsignificant trend in the proportion of mature granule cells produced [ p = 0.065, SE mice ( n = 12) vs control mice ( n = 5), Mann–Whitney RST] and a significant increase in the percentage of clusters that were “fully differentiated,” meaning the clusters contained only granule cells and astrocytes, and were devoid of progenitors [ p = 0.010, SE mice ( n = 12) vs control mice ( n = 5), two-tailed t test).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.06541.3× alphagold
The transplantation cohort exhibited increased aORs for in-hospital mortality (7.567, 95% CI: 2.867–19.974, p < 0.0001) and ICU admission (17.109, 95% CI: 8.500–34.435, p < 0.0001), with a nonsignificant trend towards increased 28-day mortality (4.866, 95% CI: 0.903–26.230, p = 0.0654).
a nonsignificant trendP =0.0661.3× alphagold
Given that the percentage of Black participants hospitalized within 6 months before baseline showed a nonsignificant trend to be higher than White participants (49% versus 39%; P =0.066), an additional analysis of all‐cause rehospitalizations was performed examining the effects of recent baseline hospitalization.
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.0661.3× alphagold
persica loads in the guts of ticks at week 5 of infection (AV = 28.5) with those found at the other time points, only a nonsignificant trend was observed (Kruskal–Wallis test H = 8.79, df = 4, P = 0.066).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.0661.3× alphagold
An additional analysis addressing the correlation between the DLT-RDM of 4-mo-olds and a synthetic model considering all the faces as one category, and all other stimuli as another category, only yielded a nonsignificant trend [mean β = 0.055; 99.17% CI = −0.027 to 0.137; t (23) = 1.932; P = 0.066; d = 0.394].
Visual object categorization in infancy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2022 · PMC8872728
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0661.3× alphagold
There was a nonsignificant trend towards higher rates of Killip class III and IV (28.6% vs. 71.4%; p = 0.066) between the BELOW and the ABOVE group ( Table 2 ). eGC height was reduced by 16% in the ABOVE compared to the BELOW group (124.9 vs. 106.8 nm; p < 0.001; Figure 2 A).