Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
a nonsignificant trendP =0.061.2× alphagold
Aldo infusion for 4 weeks also resulted in signs of systemic inflammation, with increases in serum levels of the chemokine RANTES (regulated and normal T cell secreted; 1.6±0.1‐fold; Figure 3 B), a nonsignificant trend toward increased MCP1 levels (monocyte chemotactic protein‐1; 1.8±0.3‐fold, P =0.06), and a highly significant increase in spleen size (1.52±0.06‐fold increase in spleen weight/body weight; P <0.001; Figure 3 C).
a nonsignificant trendp<0.0010.0× alphagold
The microbiological quality of drinking water improved significantly with treatment, and TC concentrations increased significantly along the finished PSW supply chain (i.e., from PWMF to POS), while there was a nonsignificant trend towards increasing E . coli concentrations along the supply chain (p<0.001 and p = 0.07, respectively).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.00180.0× alphagold
3A,D : F (2,26) = 2.51, p = 0.10) was a nonsignificant trend, the number of cFos-positive cells was significantly decreased in the CPu (Fig. 3B,E : F (2,30) = 7.871, p = 0.0018) and the dorsal hippocampus (CA3) (control: 100 ± 10.3, PS: 80.7 ± 11.1, ES: 59.5 ± 9.7; F (2,30) = 3.761, p = 0.0349) of ES mice compared to controls, with a similar non-significant trend observed in the dorsal DG (Fig. 3C,F : F (2,30) = 3.217, p = 0.0542).
a nonsignificant trendP = .0050.1× alphagold
We determined that increasing CRP was significantly associated with increased risk of clinical events in the low CrAg titer group <1:160 (odds ratio = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16–2.04), whereas the same effect was not found in the high CrAg titer group ≥1:160 (odds ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, .53–1.15), which instead saw a nonsignificant trend toward decreased events, when the model included an interaction term ( P = .005).
a significant trendp = 0.010.2× alphagold
a nonsignificant trendp > 0.12.0× alphagold
Like the sea ice cover in the Barents Sea, the wintertime SST sBS index exhibits a nonsignificant trend ( p > 0.1) during the EARLY period followed by a significant trend ( p = 0.01) during the LATE period (see Fig. 2c for comparison of the standardised time series of SST sBS and SIA BS ).
a significant trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.73514.7× alphagold
In the >4 weeks treatment duration subgroup, meta-analysis indicated a nonsignificant trend for reduction in SBP between experimental and control groups [WMD = 0.55, 95% CI (−2.63, 3.72), P = 0.735]; however, in the subgroup with treatment duration ≤ 4 weeks, there was a significant trend for reduction between the two groups [WMD = −4.42, 95% CI (−6.29, −2.20) P < 0.01] ( Figure 7 , Supplementary Figure 10 ) .
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.0130.3× alphagold
For passive NRS, an unadjusted analysis suggested a nonsignificant trend favoring group M for the 24–0 hour change (Hodges-Lehmann median difference: 1; 95% CI: 0–2; P = 0.013); statistical significance was lost once Holm correction was applied (adjusted P = 0.052).
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.01370.3× alphagold
ELN ≤ 14 and ELN > 31 showed contrasting prognostic trends: ELN ≤ 14 was significantly associated with worse survival, whereas ELN > 31 showed a nonsignificant trend toward better survival (ELN ≤ 14: HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.12–2.62, p = 0.0137; ELN > 31: HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.33–1.37, p = 0.2737) (Figure 4c ).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.0180.4× alphagold
No significant relationship between pattern similarity and behavior, despite the same response type, was observed for positive stimuli (left CA1: r = −0.015, P = 0.93; right CA1: r = −0.16, P = 0.35; vmPFC: r = 0.09, P = 0.59; dmPFC: r = 0.19, P = 0.27) (Supplemental Figure S3), and only a nonsignificant trend for neutral stimuli was observed (left CA1: r = 0.40, P = 0.018; right CA1: r = 0.30, P = 0.08; vmPFC: r = 0.29, P = 0.09; dmPFC: r = 0.13, P = 0.46; Supplemental Figure S4).