Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a favorable trend”

1,336 sentences · 1,336 papers · 2,253 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a favorable trendp<0.00010.0× alphagold
The incidence was 7.9% (79 of 994) in statin group and 14% (140 of 992) in control group, demonstrating that high-dose statin therapy preloading before PCI had a favorable trend toward the following outcome and reduced the incidence of MACE (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.71, p<0.0001) ( Figure 5 ).
a favorable trendP =0.0050.1× alphagold
In addition, both overall survival and leukemia-free survival rates showed a favorable trend toward the CAR T-cell+SCT group, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.77; P =0.005; I 2 =0%; evidence, low; and hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17–0.49; P <0.00001; I 2 =0%; evidence, low).
a favorable trendp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
In the Cox hazard analysis adjusted with IPW, Dur/Tre demonstrated a favorable trend in OS (hazard ratio [HR] <0.75) in patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥100 ng/mL) (HR 0.72, interaction p = 0.006) or double positive elevation of tumor marker (AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin [≥100 mAU/mL]) (HR 0.66, interaction p = 0.005).
a favorable trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Cumulative survival at 24 months remained stable (periods 1989–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2008, 2009–2011, 2012–2015, 2016–2019 were each 72.0%, 72.9%, 77.7%, 83.0%, 84.9%, 83.5%, p < 0.01), while renal survival showed a favorable trend in the most recent periods (there were each 68.7%, 75.4%, 76.7%, 73.4%, 78.2%, 78.4%, p < 0.01).
a favorable trendp < 0.01250.3× alphagold
Although this indicated a favorable trend towards pain reduction, the difference did not meet the adjusted statistical significance threshold ( p < 0.0125) following the Bonferroni correction ( Figure 3 ). 4.
a favorable trendp = 0.020.4× alphagold
Even the combined-endpoint favorable ventricular remodeling associated with functional improvement ( Figure 2 , Table 4 ) showed a favorable trend (log rank test p = 0.02) in non-ischemic patients, not reaching the statistical significance after adjusting for age and sex (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02–1.49; p = 0.109).
a favorable trendP =0.0360.7× alphagold
Compared with group B (IMRT alone), group A (IMRT plus sorafenib) displayed a favorable trend in median OS (11.0 versus 9.0 months, P =0.036), 1 yr and 2 yrs OS (44.9% versus 28.6% and 3.8% versus 2.6%), median PFS (6.0 versus 3.0 months, P =0.012), 1 yr and 2 yrs PFS (20.7% versus 2.7% and 6.9% versus 0.0%).
a favorable trendP = 0.0420.8× alphagold
15.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64) and showed a favorable trend in OS (50.8 vs. 43.6 months; HR, 0.78; P = 0.042) compared with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd), particularly in high-risk cytogenetics (34.3 vs. 17.1 months; HR, 0.52) and lenalidomide- and PI-refractory patients.