There was a highly significant decrease in the mean value in the Aspartame Group ( p <0.0001) as compared with the Control Group, and there was a nonsignificant decrease ( p > 0.05) in the Recovery Group as compared with the Control Group. 4.
Excerpts
The fitted regression coefficient is negative and highly significant ( β 1 = 1.5 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001).
The overall MANCOVAs for long and short range association fibers were highly significant ( P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively), indicating the presence of significant differences between groups in the overall dataset.
Since no cell death can be observed in cerebellar slice cultures under control conditions, the cell death after OGD in this region is highly significant ( P < 0.0001) about 380 times higher ( Figure 1F ).
The TUNEL counts for the Grk1 −/− ;B6J mice were also highly significant compared to the B6J and B6N mice in the 1-month-old superior retinas (****p<0.0001) but were less significant for the 1- and 3-month-old inferior retinas (***p<0.001) and the 3-month-old superior retinas (**p<0.01).
The seed viability ranged from 18% (E09) to 81% (N01), and there were a positive and highly significant relationships between seed germination and viability traits (r = 0.883; P < 0.0001).
Differences in urinary cell counts between patients with active and non-active SLE were highly significant for CD3 + CD4+, CD3 + CD8+ and CD14+ cells ( P <0.0001) and to a lesser degree also for CD19+ cells ( P = 0.0137).
A correlation analysis revealed a significant trend toward improvement of both vaginal length ( r = 0.3600, p < 0.0001) and VHI ( r = 0.4897, p < 0.0001).
Condition factor was determined for each fish sampled throughout the study and was significantly affected by date (F (5,198) = 3.423, p < 0.01) and the interaction between date and photoperiod regime (F (10, 198) = 3.159, p < 0.001) with a highly significant decline observed following transfer from SP to LL from 1.371 ± 0.037 to 1.12 ± 0.016 (p < 0.0001).
There was a significant trend between CO level and MAE (p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 ).
The log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival between the two groups (chi-square = 42.56, p < 0.0001).
Comparison between the maximum ratio observed in control and mutant animals showed that this difference in cyt/nuc ratio was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001)( Fig 3F ).
As true for PDAC, SST methylation and expression in other gastrointestinal cancers showed highly significant hypermethylation and downregulation of expression ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 4B ).
This represents a highly significant change ( t (47)=6.01; p <0.0001).
Highly significant increases in glutamate were noted in the CEA (p<0.0001) and BLA (p<0.0001; Fig. 6A ).
By contrast, the discovery cohort had a median of four (p10-p90: 1-6) and five (p10-p90: 2-9) mutations at the first and second samplings, respectively, representing a highly significant increase in the number of mutations during disease progression ( P <0.0001).
These effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) throughout all feeding phases of the trial.
Results We observed a highly significant correlation between the storage time of pRBC units and a drop in pH, as well as an increase in potassium and lactate of stored red cells ( p < 0.0001).
According to t test, differences between the analyzed genotypes were highly significant ( p <0.0001).
When combining the different types of plasma, βTG had a highly significant correlation with platelet count (r = 0.91, p<0.0001).
The reduction in PPG level was also highly significant in both groups ( P < 0.0001).
Otherwise, our shuffled genes would not show the highly significant statistical association in amino-acid divergence K a we observe between sequence domain pairs (Figure 5 ; Pearson's r 0.47, Spearman's s 0.45, P < 0.0001 for both).
Evaluating the results by applying repeated measures of variance demonstrated a highly significant difference in individual change between the two groups ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 b).
Among the tested LV constructs, one miR-126 target (hereon referred to as hGALC_126T.LV) performed at best since it allowed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) repression of hGALC activity in both CB- and BM-HSPCs at +1 day of culture ( Figure 1a ) and a sustained hGALC expression upon in vitro cell differentiation (after 14 days of liquid culture) ( Figure 1b ), in the presence of comparable vector copy number (VCN) values with the other tested constructs ( Supplementary Figure S1a ).
This difference corresponded to a risk difference of 13.2 percentage points (95% CI 10.5–15.9), a risk ratio of 4.0 (95% CI 3.4–4.6), and an odds ratio of 4.6 (95% CI 3.8–5.5), all highly significant ( p < 0.0001).