Excerpts

The correlations between the ELV and the other two lung volume indices (EELV CT and EELV MBW,He ) were somewhat weaker (r = 0.58 and r = 0.76), but still highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The distribution of newly detected discordant couples is higher in Bagalkot (18.4%) compared to Vijayapura (16.6%) and Belagavi (12.2%), with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001.

Similarly, there were also highly significant differences among the various time points (F = 109.57, P < 0.0001).

Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*) (#), and highly significant when p < 0.0001 (**) (##), versus each respective mock control or untreated control group. 3.

We did find an effect on the latency of CR onset ( Supplementary Table 4 ; F (13, 713) = 2.28, p = 0.005; ANOVA on LME) and also we observed a significant trend ( Supplementary Table 4 ; F (13, 3133) = 3.35, p < 0.0001; ANOVA on LME) for a temporal shift of the CR peak.

Dance-compound introduction resulted in a highly significant increase in the number of dance bouts versus the solvent control (t = 5.16, d.f. = 39, Tukey-Kramer adjusted p<0.0001).

A highly significant impairment of cell viability, corresponding to a 74% reduction compared to the untreated cells ( p < 0.0001), was observed in 100 μM H 2 O 2 -treated cells, in agreement with the study of Ghaffari et al.

Figure 3 shows the OR (95% CI) , where the history of GDM was found to be a highly significant risk factor with OR 3.91 (95% CI) (1.93 to 7.95) (p<0.0001).

The survival according to stage is shown in Figure 4 where there is a highly significant difference (P<0.0001).

Similarly, for studies evaluating serum TNF-α levels, visual inspection of the funnel plot also revealed asymmetry ( Figure 4 B), which was confirmed by the highly significant results of Egger’s test for publication bias ( p < 0.0001).

Except for lung cancer, there are strong and highly significant trends of increasing cancer risk with increasing height ( P < 0.0001 for colorectal cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other cancers and P = 0.002 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma).

There was a highly significant body region by modality interaction for both simultaneous ( F 2,30 = 23.8, p < 0.0001) and successive 2PD ( F 2,18 = 93.8, p < 0.0001), but no main effect of either factor (simultaneous 2PD: both factors, F < 1; successive 2PD: body region, F 2,18 = 3.0, p = 0.075; modality, F < 1).

As shown in Table 3 , the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001)and statistically significant.

The Bradley-Blackwood F test revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the datasets of one and two rounds of amplification.

Next, the result indicated highly significant differences between the dead and live groups in factors such as acidosis and sepsis ( p < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance showed that Our results in children with neuroblastoma and ganglio- there were highly significant differences between the groups neuroblastoma mirrored those previously reported (Ishiguro (P=0.0001).

3 F) demonstrate highly significant reductions in TRAF3IP2 (4IC SCR : 75 ± 1% vs. 4IC TRAF3IP2KD : 45 ± %), NAMPT (55 ± 1% vs. 10 ± %), and SIRT1 (65 ± % vs. 40 ± %); p < 0.0001.

Event-specific cumulative incidence curves were thus estimated from the decomposition of the EFS curves and a computer program (COMPETE) developed at the Institut Gustave-Roussy was used for the calculations. Results obtained using the competing risk approach were compared to the method of ignoring or censoring other events for the data provided here. Results The EFS curves for the three groups are shown in Figure 1. The difference in EFS between the low risk group and both high risk groups was highly significant (P<0.0001).

All three factors had highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), and signal intensity levels were compared between the species using Student’s t -test on residuals after the effects of Dye and Subarray had been removed.

Combining the pollinator catches for each sampling week showed a highly significant difference (F 6, 890 = 29.4, p < 0.0001) among the sampling weeks, with a steady increase from the first sampling week (25.25 ± 3.79) through the fifth week, with the highest peak occurring on week six (154.75 ± 19.90) ( Figure 3 ).

Except for the physical summary score of the SF36 questionnaire, all the subjective scores indicated a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in the participants' ability to cope with stress.

No significant correlation was found with Dukes' stage (P= 0.15), but a highly significant correlation was obtained with DNA index > 1.30 (P<0.0001) as well as 17p loss (P< 0.002). p53 content was also significantly different when it was compared to tumour site (P<0.03), with a considerably reduced incidence in the proximal colon (42.1% positive cases) compared to an average of 74.8% in the distal seg- ments. r- U- 0 30 60 FL2 b 0 30 60 FL2 C 0 30 60 FL2 Figure 4 p53/DNA FCM results for a tumour of the rectum (DNA index 1.15).

Assessment of daily compliance by MEMS The difference in the percentage of days with the correct number of doses taken between the groups was highly significant in favor of the betaxolol group (84.4% vs 64.0%, p < 0.0001).

Regarding age groups, the prevalence of infection was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

ns, p > 0.05 , not significant; p ≤ 0.05 , significant; p ≤ 0.01 , very significant; p ≤ 0.001 , highly significant; p ≤ 0.0001 , extremely significant.