Excerpts

When micro CT was compared with all the other techniques in analyzing the racial predilection of C-shaped canal configuration, it showed a statistically highly significant result with P < 0.0001 except when compared with CBCT which showed a significant value of P = 0.0303 [ Table 4 ].

Two-tailed test of independence indicated that the associations between the mortality and PBO pre-exposure are highly significant (χ 2 = 134.104, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

The average Spearman correlation between the scores of the four hypoxia profiles was 0.82 and highly significant (range 0.71–0.90, p -values < 0.0001, Figure 2 A), demonstrating that the four gene expression profiles rank patients similarly.

For garden warblers, the positive effect of day on SMI was substantial and highly significant (0.93±0.08, P <0.0001, Table 1 ).

R6/2-PBS mice was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 A,B).

The ANOVA results yielded a highly significant P-value of <0.0001, while the Wilcoxon signed-rank test produced a P-value of 0.002, both of which strongly support the superiority of our method over conventional approaches.

In the additional models by adding sequentially demographics, risk factors and markers of inflammation, HOMA-IR remained highly significant (all p < 0.0001).

When the same cohort was stratified by CAB, the results showed a higher difference in DMFS (10.84%) between the low‐ and high‐risk categories with a highly significant P ‐value of <0.0001 (Figure 2 A) suggesting that CAB is a better prognostic predictor in comparison to node status.

The statistically and practically significant differences in baseline characteristics amongst the participant categories were as expected for age ( p < 0.0001), disease duration ( p < 0.0001), ever smoker ( p = 0.0020), pack years ( p = 0.0003), antifibrotic treatment ( p < 0.0001), and immunosuppressive treatment ( p = 0.0003).

As well as statistical analysis showing that highly significant differences at p<0.0001 as shown in Figure 2 .

A separate analysis of the two age groups showed that the decrease in arousal level was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the youngest group, and non-significant in the older group.

Highly significant ( P < 0.0001) differences in susceptibilities to the disease were detected among the evaluated germplasm.

However, when we quantified the levels of mtDNA damage in daf-2 mutants, we found that mtDNA damage levels were not lower than wild type N2 controls but were in fact threefold higher in daf-2 mutants relative to wild type N2 controls and this elevation was statistically highly significant ( Figure 6 , p < 0.0001, Student’s t -test).

These changes were associated with a highly significant main effect of genotype ( F (1, 10) = 100.5, p < 0.0001).

A highly significant difference in the surface roughness for the TiT group in compare to the TiM and Zr groups for all parameters ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.

All fitted models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with R 2 ranging from 0.72 to 0.99.

brevis CD2 treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction in BoP score compared to baseline ( p < 0.0001 ).

For example, there may be significant life stage-specific decreases in efficacy of control under poorer sanitation regimes compared to better ones ( F = 26.0; df = 4, 1170; p < 0.0001; Figure 5 ).

In pilot clinical studies increased levels of Epi were detected in 20% of plasma samples collected from PC patients [ 27 ] and a highly significant positive correlation (0.91; p < 0,0001) was observed between increased blood Epi and the phosphorylation of S133CREB in prostate biopsies [ 58 ], which supports the relevance of preclinical model data to human prostate gland.

When histology of different carcinomas is correlated with benign FA with respect to phospho-ezrin, we observed that the marker was highly significant (p = 0.0001). 100% sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the above marker in the histological association of FTC, FVPTC with FA, enables us to suggest phospho-ezrin as a diagnostic marker to differentiate the follicular neoplasms.

This relationship was supported by a highly significant model ( p < 0.0001).

Sex had a highly significant association ( p = 0.0001) with HRBs.

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Both nuisance factors were highly significant (sample size: X 2 = 58.407, df = 1, p < 0.0001; mean quality of fixes: X 2 = 11.268, df = 1, p = 0.0008), indicating that these factors play an important role in determining home range size using 95% KDE and that it is justified to account for them in our models.

Shoot Induction The ANOVA revealed that BAP alone as well as combined with IBA had a very highly significant ( p < 0.0001) effect on the rate of shoot induction, number of shoot, shoot length, and number of leaf per shoot ( Table 1 ).