Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, particularly at 10 μM, a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) anti-clonogenic effect (26% inhibition) was found in MDA-MB-468 cells after three hours of exposure; meanwhile, there was a gradual decrease with increasing TQ concentration, exhibiting a significant 90% inhibition of colony formation at the highest tested concentration, 50 μM.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
During the C1INH-nf treatment periods, subjects showed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) decrease in HAE attacks (6.26 versus 12.73 attacks; p < 0.0001).
HAE therapies: past present and future.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol · 2010 · PMC2921104
highly significantp < 1 × 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In all cases, differences were highly significant ( p < 1 × 10 −4 ): A . bandense , p = 4.76 × 10 −7 ; D . pealeii , p = 2.38 × 10 −5 ; E . berryi , p = 1.37 × 10 −5 ; I . argentinus , p = 2.13 × 10 −6 ; I . illecebrosus , p = 2.77 × 10 −5 ; O . bimaculoides , p = 2.06 × 10 −8 ; S . officinalis , p = 1.06 × 10 −6 ; and A . bandense juvenile skin swabs, p = 4.77 × 10 −49 .
highly significantp-value of <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The amount of MON deposition under infinite-dose conditions was examined from three formulations: MON-NLC, MON-NLC gel, and MON in water across the epidermis, dermis, and the receiver chamber of the Franz diffusion cell after 24 h application ( Figure 11 ). A significant finding was that the MON-loaded NLC gel left much less MON on the skin surface (59.50 ± 505.81 ng/cm2) as extracted from the skin wash compared to the MON-loaded NLC (14313.11 ± 118.88 ng/cm2), with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001.
highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the median survival time (TTH) of Surgicel was lower than that of Arista, PerClot, and 4DryField, and the log-rank test showed that the difference in time to achieve hemostasis between Surgicel and each of the test articles was also highly significant ( P < .0001; Supplementary Table S3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
standard 5 mg versus reduced 2.5 mg twice daily) and differing proportions of dialysis-dependent versus non-dialysis advanced CKD patients across the included studies." Meta-regression confirmed that the specific DOAC agent was a highly significant moderator of bleeding risk (Q M = 22.88, p < 0.0001).