Given the evaluated model was highly significant at a confidence interval of 95% ( p < 0.0001 *), the correlation coefficients (R 2 ) indicate a good fit to the experimental data ( Table 4 ).
Excerpts
When the nuclear anomalies associated with cytotoxicity (PNs, KX, CC, and KL) and those associated with genotoxic damage (NBUDs) were compared, highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were found in the area of Las Pintas with respect to Las Aguilas.
The ANOVA revealed highly significant results (F 2,127 = 16.54; p < 0.0001) with significant ( p < 0.05) reduction for both diazepam and FG7142 in comparison with saline, as revealed by Newman–Keuls post-hoc test for multiple comparisons.
Statistical analysis confirmed that the blue shifts in water absorption as temperature increased from 25 to 60 °C were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
As expected, highly significant differences were observed between patients and controls in global cognitive status based on the PD-CRS [t(65) = 6.5; p < 0.0001], motor symptom severity based on the UHDRS-TMS [t(65) = 10.9; p < 0.0001], functional status based on the TFC [t(65) = 7.2; p < 0.0001], as well as on NfL plasma levels [t(65) = 10.73; p < 0.0001], all with large effect sizes (d > 0.8). 3.1 Verbal episodic memory performance The three-way mixed-effects ANOVA with recall type (free vs. cued) and time (immediate vs. delayed) as within-subjects factors, and group (HD vs.
A paired two-sample t -test between reaction times in STTs of the Rand and Rep conditions revealed a highly significant difference ( t (59) = 11.0, p < 0.0001, 95% CI of difference in RT [8.31, 12.0], Cohen’s d = 1.43) (Fig. 3 A).
For seven of these apicomplexan infections, the reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), where between ~ 30 and ~ 70% of recovered reads were derived from the host using the earlier method versus between ~ 1 and ~ 20% for UPDx (Fig. 2 a).
The correlation is highly significant with a correlation coefficient of 0.87 ( P < 0.0001, Pearson product moment correlation test).
Subsequently, the mean hexose/sucrose ratio ranged from 1.88 to 2.25, exhibiting highly significant varietal differences ( p < 0.0001).
As in the exponential fit model, there was a highly significant effect of stimulation condition (F 3,1549 = 21.3, p <.0001).
The quadratic model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with R 2 Adj = 0.9875 and R 2 Pre = 0.9433 (a difference less than 0.2), indicating excellent fit and predictability.
Jarvinen and colleagues [ 84 ] evaluated topoIIα expression immunohistochemically in 230 breast cancer specimens and found a highly significant correlation with tumour proliferation rate measured by SPF (p < 0.0001).
The two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant between-subject effects for all scores and subscores ( p < 0.0001).
The difference was statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 31.36, df = 1, p < 0.0001).
In all cases, the antioxidant formulation (samples I, II, and III) had a highly significant effect ( p -value < 0.0001, see Supplementary Materials Tables S1 and S2 ).
Simultaneously, the results from Table 2 reveal that the individual factors A and D exert a highly significant influence on the response value ( p < 0.0001), while factors B and C exhibit a significant impact ( p < 0.05).
These effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) throughout all feeding phases of the trial.
Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparisons test and statistical analyzes ( Tables S3 and S4 ) showed highly significant PHB quantity when comparing all treatments ( p < 0.0001), except for acetate and bicarbonate treatments ( p > 0.99) and acetate plus bicarbonate compared to no nitrate plus acetate ( p = 0.76).
When negative control levels were compared with positive control levels for MTH1 and APE1, highly significant differences were observed (p < 0.0001 vs p = 0.0035) ( Figure 2 A & B & Figure 3 A & B).
Viral DNA load of NS1 correlated significantly with VP1/2-DNA load (p = 0.0148; Pearson r = 0.1228; r 2 = 0.01509) and furthermore correlation of NS1- to VP1/2-RNA loads was highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001; Pearson r = 0.8817; r 2 = 0.7775).
Blepharitis scores showed an increasing trend from 1 to 7 dpi (ANOVA: p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 A).
did not achieve significanceP < 0.0001
At the L3 level, sex ( P = 0.081) and HCT‐CI ( P = 0.225) did not achieve significance, while age ( P < 0.0001), BMI ( P < 0.0001), and DRI ( P = 0.019) performed like their counterparts at the T4 level.
The risk difference (RD) for overall dentitional anomalies in the UCL phenotype was highly significant when compared with the control group ( p ≤ 0.0001, RD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.29,0.43).
A large effect size that was highly significant was seen for the interaction between rearing and sex for nodal efficiency (F (1, 20)=32.38, p<0.0001, η p 2 = 0.62; Figure 9C ).
butyracea palms and landscape disturbance The Global Moran’s I analysis revealed highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) spatial clustering of mature palms within the broader area of observed palm distribution in our study area.