Results for MANOVA of group, condition and their interaction modeling all variables together shows a highly significant Wilks Lambda statistic for group ( Λ = 0.547 [ F (11, 290) = 21.8, p = 0.000], condition ( Λ = 0.608, [ F (11, 290) = 17, p = 0.000] and group by condition interaction ( Λ 0.821 [ F (11, 290) = 5.8, p = 0.000]).
Excerpts
Regarding polyparasitism, the number of pathogens exceeds the number of patients as multiple parasites were identified in some patients ( Table 2 ). Correlation of Intestinal Parasites with CD4+ T Cell Count in HIV/AIDS Patients The relationship of IPI with CD4+ T cell counts was highly significant (P=0.000) and have negative relation (−0.385) ( Table 3 ).
nd significant increasing trend was observed in age ( P = 0.001), BMI ( P = 0.000),SBP ( P = 0.000), AST ( P = 0.000), BUN ( P = 0.000), serum CR ( P = 0.000), SUA ( P = 0.000), TC ( P = 0.007), TG ( P = 0.000), VLDL ( P = 0.000), FINS ( P = 0.000), P2INS ( P = 0.000), and HOMA-IR ( P = 0.000), but a decreasing trend in eGFR ( P = 0.000) and glycated HbA1c ( P = 0.001).
Cause of death was also highly significant: cardiac deaths (HR ≈ 2.11–2.14, p = 0.000) and vascular deaths (HR ≈ 2.30–2.31, p = 0.000) more than doubled the risk of mortality, underscoring the strong influence of comorbidity conditions.
However, presence of ≥3 coagulation abnormalities, presence of significant drop in haemoglobin post operatively and /or development of chest infection predicted death in postoperative neurosurgical patients with accuracy of 80.4% and this was highly significant ( P = 0.000).
Although the overall regression is highly significant (p = 0.000, n = 60), the 7 variables just account for 36% (R 2 ) of the total variance.
On the same line, reporting NCDs risk has been highly significant (P-value <0.000) higher and more than three times overall time, i.e.
In the SIRS criteria, tachycardia, tachypnea, and leukocytosis were highly significant ( P = .000).
The results ( Figure 3 a) indicate that storage time, BHA concentration and thyme waste extract concentration in the emulsions had highly significant effects ( p = 0.000000), and exerted great influence on the peroxide formation, whereas almond oil (L) and (Q) percentage in the emulsion did not produce a significant effect ( p > 0.05).
The statistical methods assumed a significance level of p < 0.05 and a highly significant level of p < 0.00.
However, highly significant departures in heterozygosity from mutation‐drift equilibrium were detected for all sampling localities for both crab species ( p = .000, except at Bukit Timah for P. maculata p = .00384), which are strong indications of genetic bottlenecks.
There is a statistically significant association between performing BSE in the correct way and discovering BC, with a highly significant p value of 0.000 as indicated by the Pearson's chi‐square test ( p = 0.000) (Table 5 ).
Highly significant differences in favor of MEBO group were observed in the case of medical visits (€4.28 versus €5.67, p = 0.00) hospitalization costs (418.48 versus 496.25, p = 0.01) and costs of analgesics (€0.10 versus €0.18 p = 0.00).
The final multivariate logistic regression model identified age as a highly significant risk factor for hypertension among people on ART (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.055-1.11, p=0.000).
On applying chi-square test between blood group and Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) score, a highly significant association (p=0.00) was observed.
The One-way ANOVA test reported a highly significant variance among the six groups ( P =0.000).
Fisher Exact test was then employed in two consecutive steps: the first, an overall test, resulted in highly significant differences ( p = 0.000) and strong effect size (Cramer’s V = 0.57) among the routes.
Accordingly, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for further investigating trauma-specific differences showed highly significant group differences at two hours, two and three weeks after trauma ( p = 0.000, 0.001 and 0.005).
The highly significant path (p = 0.000) was found between PEOU and PU (β = 0.623), the second highly significant path (p = 0.000) was between PEOU and US (β = 0.572), and the third highly significant path was between CPB and POEU as the (p = 0.000) and the β = 0.567.
Highly significant differences in AUDPC values ( p = 0.00) were observed for the treatments, with disease progression monitored weekly.
The one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in microbial counts among the three control groups (p = 0.000, F = 1905.58).
A highly significant positive correlation of time until flowering and altitude of origin was observed for the outdoor-grown diploid plants ( R 2 = 0.505, P = 0.000) as well as a significant positive correlation for the other diploid study groups (cold treatment, R 2 = 0.240, P = 0.024; warm treatment, R 2 = 0.260, P = 0.026).
The key ANOVA findings are as follows: Model significance: the overall model is highly significant ( F = 14.02, p = 0.000), explaining 85.38% of the total variation.
The mean placental diameter was 17.9 ± 1.9 cm (range 15–25) in Group B, whereas it was 21.7 ± 2.3 cm (range 14–26) in Group A, and the difference between both groups was highly significant ( P < 0.000) [ Table 2 ].
Here again the differences were highly significant (χ 2 531.4, p<0.0000).