Excerpts

Correlation among pod set, yield and nut quality traits of BUNSO progeny crosses Highly significant (P < 0.001) and positive correlation was observed between number of pods and pod set, pod weight and pod set, number of nuts per pod and number of pods, number of nuts per pod and pod weight, outturn and pod set, outturn and number of pods, outturn and pod weight, outturn and weight of unpeeled nuts, outturn and weight of peeled nuts (Supplementary Fig.

A highly significant correlation was found between the RNA-seq and real-time RT-PCR results (P = 0.001, R2 = 0.9607).

Nocturia showed a highly significant reduction (Hedges’ g = − 0.66, 95% CI − 0.91 to − 0.40, p < 0.001) with minimal heterogeneity (I 2 = 3.6%).

All assessed outcomes demonstrated considerable heterogeneity, with I2 values exceeding 90% and highly significant Cochran’s Q statistics ( p < 0.001).

Overall, average water cortisol levels from the three initial stress tests significantly predicted whole-body cortisol levels when both sexes were combined in the model, but whereas the association was significant in males it did not quite reach statistical significance in females (full model: R 2 = 0.64, p < 0.001, males: R 2 = 0.52, p < 0.05, females: R 2 = 0.40, p = 0.09, Fig. 2 C).

One-Way ANOVA indicated highly significant effects of model variant on Clean Accuracy (F = 26.21, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.019), Adversarial Accuracy (F = 168.39, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.112), and Robustness Drop (F = 124.28, p < 0.001).

Variability of seed morphological and biochemical traits The variation was highly significant among accessions for all the quantitative seed morphological traits ( p < 0.001).

The combination of adequate statistical power and highly significant p-values ( p < 0.001 for maximum comparisons) provides strong evidence in support of our performance claims.

These differences remained highly significant after weighting (AMD for FTO = 4.76; p < 0.001 and AMD for MC4R = − 0.91; p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Before the pandemic, there was a slight insignificant increasing trend in opioid poisonings that changed significantly after the pandemic (1.47 cases per month, p-value = 0.006, Table 3 ) and led to an increasing trend of 1.53 monthly cases during the pandemic (p-value < 0.001).

Within small ruminants, a highly significant disparity was detected among Ovis aries , Capra hircus , and Capreolus capreolus (F2,176 = 38.59, p < 0.001), with Ovis aries showing the largest average centroid size (CS), followed by Capra hircus , while Capreolus capreolus consistently exhibited the smallest values.

Statistical significance testing across 1000 test images confirms highly significant improvements ( p < 0.001) with large effect sizes, while ablation studies validate the requirement of each model component.

The full RDA model (including environmental and spatial variables) was highly significant (F = 2.1, p < 0.001), and the first two axes of the full model explained 77% of the total variance (Fig. 4 a).

*** indicates a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.001.

Both interventions led to highly significant improvements in all domains of subjective well-being (emotional, psychological, and social) and the Total Subjective Well-being score from baseline ( p < 0.001).

The patching effects were highly significant for both mask types (parallel: t(13) = 5.8, P < 0.001; cross-oriented: t(13) = 7.9, P < 0.001).

For ethanol–water mixtures, Δt2 significantly decreases with increasing temperature across most concentrations, with several comparisons showing highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001).

In Group A (SE ≥ -3.00D, 15 eyes), the difference was significant ( P = 0.0018), while in Group B (SE < -3.00D, 27 eyes), the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

78 (22%) out of 350 cases showed positive ANO1 expression and a highly significant correlation was found when comparing ANO1 immunostaining detected with both antibodies (Spearman’s rho 0.917, P < 0.001).

The specificity was higher in the weakly-supervised DL model than the fully-supervised DL model with automated ROI annotation with statistical significance or borderline significance ( P < 0.001, P = 0.07, and P = 0.04 in VGG16, ResNet34, and GoogLeNet models, respectively).

An increasing trend was observed in CO data until the 16th h (P < 0.001), and then CO dropped significantly below the level of the sham-operated animals at the 20th h (P < 0.001).

Similarly, Mix 24 (mean = 77.17 MPa) demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) compared to Mix 1 (mean = 52.40 MPa).

The KMO measure of sampling adequacy was 0.873, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the sampling of the variables was adequate.

As expected, a main effect of Emotion was highly significant ( F (5,316) = 62.74, p < 0.001, effect size, eta-squared η 2 = 0.54).

Highly significant positive correlations were found between the percentages of lauric acid in LT and hair in the analysis of the total dataset ( r = 0.48; P = 0.001) and when farm 1 was analyzed separately (UCKxBEEF, r = 0.49; P < 0.05).