Excerpts

Among the regressors, ‘population affected’ and ‘damage to public utilities’ were highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting strong positive effects on the dependent variable.

When the cross-modal attention mechanism was introduced on top of the S-I module, it showed highly significant (p < 0.001, between CNN and CNN + S-I-C module) accuracy, with very significant (p < 0.01) AUC and F-1 scores.

Data were statistically analysed following ANOVA one way or two way test, followed by the post-hoc Tukey test, with differences considered significant ( p < 0.05, * or lowercase letter), very significant ( p < 0.01, ** or bold lowercase letter), highly significant ( p < 0.001, *** or capital letter) or very highly significant ( p < 0.0001, **** or bold capital letter).

The mixed ANOVA conducted on the N450 time window, revealed a highly significant main effect of Condition ( F (1, 45) = 39.71, p < 0.001) with a large effect size ( η 2 = 0.468), indicating larger amplitude for INHIB than INIT trials, and a significant main effect of Group ( F (1, 45) = 4.87, p < 0.05), with smaller effect size ( η 2 = 0.097), consisting of larger N450 amplitude for CTL than DEP participants.

The statistical validity of these findings is supported by strong t-statistics and p-values, demonstrating a highly significant difference in pain score reduction favoring the observation group from day 3 onward ( p < 0.001).

The PCA was justified by sufficient high correlations (0.79 by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin-Kriterium, and p < 0.001 by the Bartlett-Test as highly significant) to derive the extraction of two factors.

P values were set at 0.05 (P < 0.05) for significant difference (*), 0.01 (P < 0.01) for highly significant difference (**), and 0.001/0.0001 (P < 0.001/P < 0.0001) for extremely significant difference (***/****).

The adjusted results showed that the risk of MetS in the Q2 and Q3 groups remained significantly lower than in the Q1 group, with adjusted OR (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.87) and 0.70 (0.61–0.80), both reaching highly significant levels ( P < 0.001).

***Highly significant from control at p < 0.001, compared to control.

However, there was a highly significant relationship between the type of poison and pulse, blood pressure, echocardiography, cholinesterase level, and silver nitrate test with P < 0.001.

The ANOVA for NIHSS scores (Table 5 ) revealed highly significant main effects of Time (MS = 1852, F(3, 48) = 676.9, ηp2 = 0.96, p < 0.001) and Group (MS = 2175, F(1, 50) = 169.2, ηp2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Group interaction (MS = 424, F(3, 48) = 155.2, ηp2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).

The temporal AMOVA based on microsatellites revealed absence of genetic structure among the five temporal groups ( F CT = 0.10, P = 0.19), but a highly significant genetic structure within temporal groups ( F SC = 0.23, P < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

Furthermore, after adjusting sepsis, GI bleed, and HRS diagnosis as covariates, the association between AKI and mortality remained highly significant (adjusted OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.14–6.09, p < 0.001), confirming that AKI is an independent predictor beyond these confounders.

Chi-square tests reinforced these categorical relationships, with highly significant results for substance use (χ 2 = 14.2, p < 0.001) and social support (χ 2 = 18.9, p < 0.001).

PL, FGW and SeB showed a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation with THGW (lower panels in Fig. 1 ).

3GC and fluoroquinolone resistance showed a decreasing trend over the decade ( p < 0·001, p = 0.002, respectively).

Overall the full model was highly significant (F 14, 558 = 30.03, P < 0.001) and explained a moderate amount of variance in the data (R 2 = 0.415).

The likelihood-ratio test for nonlinearity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Statistical evaluation of raw data before and after training in preparations (mV for Pa2/3 and frequency in % for other neurons) showed that changes in responsiveness in serotonergic #4 pedal neurons and premotor withdrawal interneurons #2/3 after training were highly significant (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, P < 0,001), while changes in the metacerebral neuron (MtC1) involved in feeding behavior were non-significant.

The model was highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001), explaining 26%, 34% and 86% of the variance for latitude, longitude and depth, respectively (Suppl.

Additionally, a highly significant positive correlation was found between immature B cells and activated B cells (cor = 0.88, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6 D).

There was a highly significant difference between the human stool and hand swabs ( p < 0.001).

Results In the three years prior to the experiment (2008–2010), mean DNA yields from samples taken from the field for bare fallow, arable and grassland were 21, 95 and 298 μg g -1 dry soil, respectively with no significant differences between replicate plots within each treatment and highly significant differences between treatments ( F 2,18 = 646, P < 0.001, all means significantly different at α = 0.05) and no interaction between treatments and years, indicating that the effects of treatments and time were independent.

we found a positive trend between urinary cotinine level and high levels of TPO Ab (p < 0.001 in males, p = 0.0873 in females).

There was a significant trend of increased fibrotic improvement rate in patients from F01 to F4 (P < 0.001).