Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In an exploratory fashion, we simplified the model by removing the random slope and found that the comparison between accuracies for consistent and inconsistent materials was statistically highly significant, ß = 0.396, SE = 0.0968, z ratio = 4.086, p < 0.001, whereas there was still no consistency effect for scrambled materials ( p = 0.231).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, three variables were found to have highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) with TCL at every scale and region assessed—FDI (positively correlated at each scale/region), percent of rural population (negatively correlated at each scale/region with a slightly weaker correlation in Africa [p < 0.01]), and GDP per capita (positively correlated across scales/regions except for Africa, which was negatively correlated at the p < 0.01 level) (Supplementary Figs.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data were statistically analysed following ANOVA one way or two way test, followed by the post-hoc Tukey test, with differences considered significant ( p < 0.05, * or lowercase letter), very significant ( p < 0.01, ** or bold lowercase letter), highly significant ( p < 0.001, *** or capital letter) or very highly significant ( p < 0.0001, **** or bold capital letter).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation among pod set, yield and nut quality traits of BUNSO progeny crosses Highly significant (P < 0.001) and positive correlation was observed between number of pods and pod set, pod weight and pod set, number of nuts per pod and number of pods, number of nuts per pod and pod weight, outturn and pod set, outturn and number of pods, outturn and pod weight, outturn and weight of unpeeled nuts, outturn and weight of peeled nuts (Supplementary Fig.
nearly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Two-way repeated analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with within-participant factors of target distance and trajectory for each target type revealed significant or nearly significant main effects of distance for all target types (T: F 1,9 = 42.27, p < 0.001, η G 2 = 0.041; VT: F 1,9 = 11.21, p = 0.009, η G 2 = 0.040; V: F 1,9 = 4.11, p = 0.073, η G 2 = 0.028) and trajectories (T: F 1,9 = 4.79, p = 0.056, η G 2 = 0.013; VT: F 1,9 = 4.10, p = 0.073, η G 2 = 0.006; V: F 1,9 = 10.16, p = 0.011, η G 2 = 0.021).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
One-way ANOVA results in Table 17 reveal highly significant differences across methods (F-statistics 156.92–312.45, all p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.82–0.91), with Tukey HSD post-hoc tests confirming the proposed method’s superiority over all baselines.