The ANOVA results for the Naphtha cut of heavy oil which are presented in Table 10 , indicate that the model as a whole is highly significant, with a p value of < 0.0001 and an F-value of 1518.48, suggesting that the factors included in the model explain a substantial portion of the variability in naphtha yield.
Excerpts
bacteria resulted in highly significant increases in bacterial growth ( P < 0.0001), compared to controls.
Notably, the combination treatment resulted in the most pronounced improvement with a highly significant reduction in TC, LDL and TG ( p < 0.0001) and a marked increase in HDL ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 8 ).
All these final selected variables showed a highly significant negative relationship with the infection rate (p < 0.0001; Tmin r = − 0.25, AP r = − 0.23, RH r = − 0.21).
As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability.
ANOVA results indicated a highly significant model, as demonstrated by an exceptionally high F-value of 644.09 and a low probability value (p-value < 0.0001), underscoring the reliability of the developed model (Table 5 ).
Chemotype extract concentration also had a strong and highly significant effect on nematode motility (F = 20.44, p < 0.0001), demonstrating a clear dose-dependent response.
Bernoulli GLMM analysis of the effect of forest fragment size on tree hyrax singing indicated that “forest size” was a highly significant covariate in tree hyrax singing probability (P-value < 0.0001) (Table 1 e, Fig.
The difference between Control and Supplemented group was overall highly significant (effect of supplement, P < 0.0001), with a significant interaction with time (P < 0.0001) as the effects were mostly measured from d42 and even stronger at d49 and d56 (mean concentration were for Control and Supplemented group respectively, of 2.9 ± 0.2, vs 7.0 ± 0.4 Log 10 copies of 16S rDNA/g of rumen content at d49 and of 2.6 ± 0.3 vs 7.7 ± 0.3 Log 10 copies of 16S rDNA/g of rumen content at d56).
Of note, the overall survival of IDH-WT patients in our cohort was worse than the one of IDH-m patients and, as expected, the difference was highly significant using the Kaplan–Meier method (p < 0.0001, Log-rank test, Fig.
Nevertheless, the highly significant difference between diaphragm and blood host-origin levels (~ 47% versus ~ 13%, respectively; P < 0.0001) in the shielded mice implicates monocyte-independent macrophages as a major contributor to the normal tissue-resident macrophage population of the diaphragm.
ventralis with Y2 were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 ), and A . wilkella was recorded exclusively in the samples of this subcluster.
The difference between 1 μg and 2 μg PFF was not significant (0.41 uint8 increase, p = 1.0), 2 and 4 μg PFF was quite significant (8.87 uint8 increase, p < 0.0001), and 4 and 6 μg PFF was not significant (1.27 uint8 increase, p = 0.89).
Construct validity of the A-DSSS The exploratory factor analysis of the DFS-A scale showed a KMO measure of 0.936 which was above the commonly accepted value of 0.60 23 as well as a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of sphericity (χ 2 = 2720.798, df = 231, p-value < 0.0001) indicating that factor analysis was suitable (Table 4 ).
The difference between the obese ZDF group and the STZ-treated WT group was highly significant ( fa/fa : liver +45%, p < 0.0001; kidney + 64%, p < 0.0001).
Pearl development kinetics Analyzing kinetics data over the 12 months of the study, we observed, as expected, a very highly significant difference in nacre thickness between harvest times ( p < 0.0001).
No significant differences in the prognostic value are noted between iPET-2 and i-PET-4 with both showing highly significant differences in EFS between the CMR and nCMR patients ( P -value < 0.0001): patients with iPET-2-CMR and iPET-2-nCMR had 3-y-EFS’s of 93.1% and 45.5%, respectively while the respective values for patients with iPET-4-CMR and iPET-4-nCMR were 89.5 and 39.4%.
A paired t-test again showed this difference to be highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Of the 378 pairwise tests conducted among 28 kelp populations, 370 were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and 6 were significant ( P < 0.05) after FDR correction ( Supplementary Table S5 ).
Compared to age-matched controls, the whole cohort of patients had highly significant higher levels of both calgranulins (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0030, respectively).
Examining the distribution of trends from the full multimodel ensemble, the median trend lies close to the mean trend, and 68% of the multimodel realizations exhibit a positive trend, which is highly unlikely to have arisen from chance ( p < 0.0001 based on the null hypothesis of red noise; see Table 1 and Methods).
Linear regression analysis performed using the Passing-Bablok technique showed that the highly significant relationship between these two variables is given by the quadratic equation NFA FIJI = 2.78 × 10 −4 (NFL) 2 + 0.72(NFL) + 471 (solid curve in Fig. 7 ; p < 0.0001).
The incidence of CHF was significantly higher in patients in Q4 (with the highest levels of the combined indicator) versus those in Q1 (with the lowest levels of the combined indicator), as indicated by highly significant intergroup differences ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 A).
1B ), yielding highly significant differences between melody types [F(1,35) = 741.91, p < 0.0001].
Additionally, this cluster contained a highly significant 2.8-fold enrichment of immunity proteins (p < 0.0001), including proteins involved in the regulation of complement activation (p = 0.034).