According to Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the lack of fit was not significant ( P > 0.05), which indicated that the regression equation was a good fit and the selected model was appropriate.
Excerpts
7 8 Surface roughness model (SR) The ANOVA results in the Supplementary Table 3 summarizes the statistical results for the response model, indicating that the overall model is highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
Two-tailed test of independence indicated that the associations between the mortality and PBO pre-exposure are highly significant (χ 2 = 134.104, df = 1, p < 0.0001).
By week 1, the Col/Cs/A-PRF group showed a significant reduction in BMD (~ 650 HU) compared to the C group (~ 750 HU), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical significance of the scavenging and inhibitory activities was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) across all concentrations and treatment groups followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism V.11.0.0.The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences among all treatment groups ( p < 0.0001), with F-values substantially exceeding the corresponding critical F-value, indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis Table (S 1,2).
In addition, Spearman’s correlation analysis showed a moderately significant association between 2-methylbutyric acid and CHD development ( r = 0.5037, p = 0.0001).
As expected, highly significant differences were observed between different subgroups in relation to blood concentration (blood/feces p-< 0.0001, blood/mix p = 0.0155).
Chemotype extract concentration also had a strong and highly significant effect on nematode motility (F = 20.44, p < 0.0001), demonstrating a clear dose-dependent response.
Both cRBF and eGFR demonstrated a highly significant increase at 3 months compared to baseline (mean cRBF 251.71 ± 78.27 vs. 486.61 ± 156.08 ml/kidney/min, p = 0.0001; mean eGFR 46.62 ± 16.36 vs. 69.81 ± 24.83 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ; p = 0.02) and remained consistent until the end of the observed period.
As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability.
Notably, the GSE10072 and TCGA-LUAD datasets showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001), while the GSE140797 dataset, though with a smaller sample size, also exhibited statistical significance ( p < 0.05), as shown in (Fig. 6 ).
Statistical analysis revealed that the differences in surfactin production across these carbon sources were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The statistical significance and adequacy of this quadratic model were confirmed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), as detailed in Table S3 , which showed a highly significant model ( P < 0.0001) and a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.3012).
The relative pixel density for Cyst C was 56.71 (47.58–67.65) in normal controls versus 5.06 (3.83–13.21) in PCNSL, representing a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001).
The data on disease severity revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ) in the percentage of necrotic leaf area (%NLA) and pycnidia coverage (%PC) between the isolates, wheat differential lines, and their two-way interactions (Table 2 ).
4 a) showed a highly significant interaction between culture medium and initial inoculum concentration ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of inoculum depended on the culture medium.
In pancreas, the correlation between MRPS6 and HSP9A , HSPD1 , LONP1 and CLPP was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and strong (R = 0.68, 0.60, 0.65, and 0.49, respectively) (Fig. 2 B).
Likewise, a decreasing trend in mean GnRH-IR expression was also noticed between group 3 and group 5 ( p < 0.0001) and between group 4 and group 5 ( p < 0.01).
At the low and moderate doses (5 and 10 mg/L nCS), there was a highly significant increase in MDA content ( P < 0.0001) in all four examined tissues compared to the control group.
Interestingly, cytology parameters also showed highly significant differences between benign lesions and healthy controls (all p < 0.0001).
All dependent variables were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) to the independent variables studied, apart from the β-carotene which was non-significant ( p > 0.05).
Specifically, P60/T40-P80/AN20 showed highly significant weight loss compared to P60/T40, P80/T20, and P80/AN20 ( p < 0.0001).
In contrast, the average tumor volume in MI-503 group was only 587.19 ± 240.69 mm 3 , highly significant smaller than that in vehicle group ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 A).
A highly significant decrease in EPS dry weight was observed in E. faecium , E.faecalis , E. aerogens (**** p < 0.0001), S.epidermidis , and A. baumannii (*** p < 0.001) as compared to control.
In contrast, native jugular veins showed a clear, dose-dependent relaxation, reaching highly significant differences at the maximal concentration ( p < 0.0001 vs. all graft groups; Fig. 2 A).