The same LED treatments showed a highly significant ( p = 0) difference in lettuce antioxidant activity (in μmol FeSO 4 L −1 ) when the intensity of lights became lower 60 μmol m −2 s −1 ( Figure 3 B), and the highest level of antioxidant activity (in μmol FeSO 4 L −1 ) was at B345/R, followed by B450/R, with increasing rate by about 53 and 420%, compared with B450/R and B/R-rich, respectively.
Excerpts
They preferred eudicot plants over monocot plants, with a highly significant difference observed (χ 2 = 15.565, df = 1, p = 0.000), and showed a preference for herbaceous plants over woody plants (χ 2 = 1.087, df = 1, p = 0.405) ( Figure 5 ).
The highly significant results of the omnibus models ( p < 0.000) indicate that these associations are highly unlikely to have occurred by chance.
On the other hand, the isolated effects of the product factor were highly significant, with p = 0.0000 for g s , p = 0.0009 for C i , and p = 0.0031 for E .
Furthermore, the regression model suggested that altitude alone does not significantly affect transect richness (T = −1.19, p = 0.2431), contrasting with the highly significant effect of Asteraceae richness (T = 5.36, p = 0.0000).
Effect of Stachys circinata Extracts on Catalase Activity and Glutathione Concentrations Our data showed that the CAT activity was highly significant in cells treated with different concentrations of S. circinata extract as compared to the control group ( p = 0.000) ( Figure 2 ).
● The number of varroa in the apiary after treatment According to the variance analysis performed with the GLM test, the number of varroa that died varies in a highly significant manner ( p = 0.000, p < 5%), depending on the number of bees in the hives, and does not depend on the number of treatment period.
The Fu’s Fs was highly significant and negative ( Fs = −369.901, p = 0.0000), indicating an excess number of alleles, as would be expected from a recent population expansion or genetic hitchhiking.
ANOVA for the budburst period, indicated by the arrows on the Figure 1 graphs, showed a highly significant budburst increase in Figure 1 B–F, ( p = 0.0000), but less significant in A ( p = 0.1191).
The cophenetic correlation coefficient ( r = 0.785) between the dendrogram and its original matrix, as verified by Mantel’s Z-statistics, was highly significant ( p = 0.000).
This cleavage event was strongly supported by 16,415.36 reads, ranked as the global maximum (Category 0) with highly significant confidence ( p = 0.00).
Outcomes were statistically correlated to a negative control group, and most effects were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.000).
The CytoTRACE score showed a weak but highly significant negative correlation with latent time (Spearman ρ = −0.25, p = 1.9 × 10 −118 ), indicating that, although capturing distinct facets of the transcriptome, the two orthogonal approaches suggested on a common developmental trajectory from mesophyll precursors toward terminally differentiated guard cells ( Tables S1 and S2 ). 3.2.
For the chloroplast genome, the average sequencing depth (the average number of reads representing a given nucleotide; also referred to as read depth or average cover) of silica gel dried material was 1.7 times higher than that of herbarium material, and this difference was highly significant (Mann-Whitney p = 1.8 × 10 −88 ).
Chi-square tests yielded the most highly significant results for terpenoids ( p = 1.2 × 10 −41 ), amino acids and derivatives ( p = 1.6 × 10 −35 ), flavonoids ( p = 3.1 × 10 −33 ), lipids ( p = 4.8 × 10 −15 ), flavonols ( p = 1.8 × 10 −12 ), phenolic acids ( p = 2.6 × 10 −12 ), and flavones ( p = 1.1 × 10 −11 ). 3.2.
A joint likelihood-ratio test (LRT) comparing the model of four SNPs with the null model confirmed a highly significant improvement in model fit (LRT = 82.7, df = 4, p = 4.76 × 10 −17 ) with an overall ΔMcFadden R 2 = 0.230.
Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant effect of treatment on fungal growth (F(20, 42) = 56.52, p < 2 × 10 −16 ).
The linear model is highly significant ( p -value < 2 × 10 − 16 ), and 62% of the ENL variance is explained by the time of development ( R a d j 2 ≈ 0.62 ), while the residuals of the model follows a normal distribution ( p -value 0.3375 in the Shapiro–Wilk test; see Supplementary SI.2 for details).
All correlations were highly significant ( p -value < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), implying that site-specific PTM changes are consistently associated with deviations in protein abundance that cannot be explained by RNA-level changes alone ( Figure 7 b).
Fisher’s exact test revealed a highly significant association between treatments and inhibition scores at both 24 hpi and 96 hpi ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).
The most associated SNP, AX_91849634, was found on chromosome 3 with a highly significant p -value of ≤1.53 × 10 −14 .
Interaction of the proteins from the protein-coding genes seen in Figure S2 revealed a highly significant network ( p = 9.04 × 10 −12 ) with 76 connections, an average node degree of 2.53, an average local clustering coefficient of 0.382, and a maximum interaction score of 0.50.
This showed a highly significant effect of corewood type ( p = 6.89 × 10 −11 ) and a somewhat less significant effect of tree number ( p = 2.77 × 10 −10 ).
LEF was particularly sensitive to urban stress, showing a highly significant treatment effect ( p = 8.6 × 10 −11 ) and a 62.33% decrease during peak summer stress under urban conditions.
For Subfamily 5 (16 ALMT loci, OG0008930), the test detected highly significant positive selection on terminal Vaccinium branches ( Figure 4 A): 2ΔlnL = 40.65 (df = 1; raw mixture-distribution p = 9.1 × 10 −11 ; Bonferroni-adjusted p = 2.7 × 10 −10 ), with the alternative model recovering a foreground ω 2 ≈ 34.95 in 5.6% of sites.