p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.
Excerpts
Concerning the correlations between the measured endocrine parameters in chickens (regardless of the butyrate exposure), highly significant (P < 0.001) positive correlations were found between plasma GIP and GLP-1 values ( Fig 3A ), GIP and insulin levels ( Fig 3B ) and GLP-1 and insulin concentrations ( Fig 3C ).
The ANOVA results demonstrated that the tests were highly significant, with P < 0.001.
In IPGTT, no significant difference (P<0.01) was found between the basal plasma glucose levels of wistar and GK-Gel from the plasma glucose levels observed after 120 minutes of glucose administration whereas, a highly significant difference (P<0.001) was observed between the basal plasma glucose levels and plasma glucose levels after 120 minutes of glucose administration ( Fig. 2A ) in GK-Saline.
Here, a Student’s t -test revealed highly significant latency differences between conditions ( t (17)adj = -14.143, p < 0.001, d = -6.860).
However, the effect of variety on fresh weight was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that background genetics played a stronger role than salinity treatment on fresh weight.
NCDs showed an increasing trend as age increased (p<0.001).
The differences in CBSV infection among cassava varieties was highly significant (ANOVA, F 2,6 = 24.1, P<0.001).
When four additives with RNA and four without RNA content are combined together into two groups, differences between means of percentage of sa WT phenotype is highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P <0.001).
The increase in titer from week 2 to week 12 was highly significant ( P <0.001).
Accordingly, aversive learning scores differ among thermal responsiveness score categories (one-way ANOVA, F 6,181 = 5.34, p<0.001) and the linear relationship between both variables is highly significant (Spearman correlation, ρ 2 = 0.93, p<0.001, 8 df).
Another result to highlight is the highly significant difference between cases and controls regarding the mean number of risk alleles at the 14 selected adenoma susceptibility loci (p<0.001).
The effect of temperature was highly significant with lower temperature resulting in higher adult L. bostrychophila counts (t = −5.763, p<0.001).
This model was highly significant in predicting vowel category (short vs. long) based on the duration of each vowel, Estimate = 0.004, Error = 0.0001, z = 37.66, p <0.001.
The infection intensity of coccidia had a highly significant effect on the infection intensity of nematodes ( P < 0.001, Fig 4-1 ), exhibiting a positive correlation coefficient of 0.187 ( P < 0.001).
At Geeveston, the mean DBH of the long-distance crosses was only marginally (at the 5% significance level) greater than the mid-parent value by age 13 years, but at Weilangta highly significant ( P ≤0.001) heterosis was evident by age 9 years ( Table 1 ).
PERMANOVA analysis showed highly significant differences in the composition of fish assemblage (p = 0.001) for the factor Depth and pair-wise tests revealed that these differences were always significant except for the comparisons between the two deeper layers (101–150 vs 151–200; p = 0.241).
7 ) are all highly significant ( P <0.001) under various fertilization treatments.
Violin plots ( Fig 8A and 8B ) revealed highly significant differences in PFKFB3 and DDIT3 expression between the control and OA groups (*** P < 0.001): both genes were highly expressed in controls and significantly downregulated in OA—consistent with prior differential analysis and RF results.
The substrate material (skeleton or polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE) had a highly significant affect on the UV reflectance (One-Way ANOVA, F(3,8) = 82, p<0.001, Fig. 3A ).
Associations between pairs of rig within harbour arms were all highly significant (p≤0.001), indicating overlapping habitat use at the daily level.
Overall, the most relevant parameters explaining LULC in the region were the topographic driver grouping (which incorporates elevation and slope), this driver grouping was highly significant for the majority of the transitions studied (p<0.001, Table 3 ), with the exception of the shrub and herb loss.
The ANOVA output of the ABCD test versions indicated highly significant differences between the subjects ( p <0.001, CI = 0.160, 0.244), almost significant differences between the age groups ( p = 0.052, CI = 0.002, 0.235), and no significant differences between the parallel test versions ( p = 0.120, CI A − B = -0.013, 0.078, CI A − C = -0.061, 0.029, CI A − D = -0.017, 0.073).
There was a highly significant correlation between the right and left baPWV (r = 0.944, p<0.001).
Interestingly, statistical treatment of B-ARISA results indicated that the difference between endophytic communities from organic and IPM vineyards was highly significant ( p <0.001) when analysed using a permutation test for CAP scale after 9999 reiterations, while the difference between endophytic communities found in Merlot and Chardonnay was not statistically significant.