Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After controlling for monthly variation in rainfall, temperature, and relative humidity, the long-term trend interaction term (treated_group#c.monthly_date) remained highly significant (beta = −0.0056, 95% CI: −0.0076, −0.0037,p < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Functional Evaluation of Low-level Visual Age-related Changes ISF perimetry (Intermediate spatial frequency channel) We measured achromatic CS at an intermediate spatial frequency for nine visual field locations (see Figure 1A for data across quadrants and Figure 2 for representative examples of age-related CS decline obtained with ISF perimetry for each age group) and found a highly significant effect of aging on mean CS [F (4,164) = 53.09, p<0.001].
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, species differences in the proportion of aphids that fell from the host plant as a result of chill coma were highly significant (χ 2 2 = 20.80 p<0.001), with significantly more M. dirhodum falling from the plant as a result of chill coma, and significantly less R. padi than expected (relative proportions for M. dirhodum , R. padi and S. avenae are 0.45, 0.02 and 0.21 respectively).
highly significantp-value of <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Tumor focality was a strong predictor of survival, as patients with unifocal tumors had a median survival of 17 months (95% CI: 15.111–18.889), while those with multifocal tumors had a median survival of only 6 months (95% CI: 2.801–9.199), with a highly significant p-value of <0.001.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
To verify that the differences between the four FSE criticality indices were substantively meaningful and not artefacts of small numerical variation, a Friedman test was conducted, yielding a highly significant result (χ2 (3) = 72.255, p < 0.001), confirming that respondents rated the four critical role constructs significantly differently overall as shown in Table 6 .
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The association between PLR, NLR, MLR, SII and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality The Kaplan–Meier curve revealed an increasing trend in long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates with higher levels of PLR, NLR, MLR, and SII ( P < 0.001, Fig 3 – 4 ).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The decrease in viability was highly significant (p<0.001 by unifactorial ANOVA for all cell lines), Post-hoc testing reveals that the difference between solvent control and salinomycin treatment is significant for all concentrations >1 μM for all tested cell lines after 72 hrs; the difference is significant for 1 μM only in MDA-MB-453.
highly significantp = .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A test of the first set of predictions using a 2 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA with condition (easy-fight, easy-flee) and hand (fight hand, flee hand) as within-subject factors revealed a highly significant interaction effect, F (1, 29) = 13.10, p = .001, η 2 p = .31, in line with the goal-directed account (see Fig 4 ).