Excerpts

p > 0.1) or highly significant (e.g. p < 0.001).

However, the indices are not as good as those of the model in which item ATI4 was removed [�2 (33, N = 359) = 181, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.04] and the chi-squared difference is highly significant [��2 (9 = N = 359) = 51, p <.001].

As this was highly significant (p<0.001), subsequent models were presented stratified by short (≤6h) or normal-long (>6h) sleep duration.

An analytical approach describing the response curve by logistic regression highlights the highly significant correlation between response and sound frequency (% of responding oysters = 2.021–0.006 frequency; p < 0.001).

Indeed, while highly significant for Filipinos (p<0.001), we detected only a moderate association of rs2237892 (KCNQ1) with GDM in Japanese subjects (p = 0.03) and none in Pacific Islanders (p = 0.49) ( Table 3 ).

The subsequent pairwise posthoc analysis was highly significant for all pairs (p < 0.001).

The correlation between expectations and previous grades was highly significant and positive ( r = .89, p < .001) and significantly higher than the correlation between aspirations and previous grades ( r = .54, p < .001), z = 5.24, p = .001.

In addition, the quadratic term was highly significant, F (1, 13) = 69.4, p<.001.

Crucially, however, when adding the dummy variable (with D = 1 if the observation was a response to a non-symbolic stimulus, and D = 0 if it was a response to a symbolic stimulus) the weight of the dummy x logarithmic interaction was highly significant ( B D x log = 0.029, st. error = 0.006, t ratio = 4.727, df = 22, p < 0.001), confirming that significant differences in logarithmic compression do exist between fast responses to non-symbolic and symbolic stimuli.

Seedling morphometrics In 2005, distance had a highly significant effect on number of leaves per seedling, with more leaves per seedling away (7.6±0.3 leaves) than close (6.2±0.2; F 1, 97 = 12.54, P <0.001).

Interferential statistics proved a highly significant change with a very large effect size (ǀ d ǀ = 1.7; p < 0.001).

In the CTRL group, an increase of BLI was observed, while in the group treated with NTP (NTP group) a highly significant stabilization was induced by the treatment (p<0,001 at D30).

1B ), using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test: in both cases the difference is highly significant ( P<0.001 ).

[ 39 ] from the same samples, a Spearman rank-order correlation shows a highly significant correlation ( p <.001) with correlation coefficients of ρ > 0.8, further supporting our data.

Strikingly, all 41 IFN-responsive target genes are induced to a higher level in the keratinocytes harbouring higher Wnt5a levels, corresponding to a statistically highly significant 1.8±1.1-fold relative hyper-induction across all target genes (p = 0.001).

For the non-small cell lesions that comprised a majority of the cancer patients, there was a highly significant (P<0.001) increase in the value of the LEBS marker.

All sources of variation were highly significant ( P<0.001 ) and more than 95% of the variance was explained by differences within the A, B and D genomes, whereas only a small part of the overall variance (less than 5%) could be attributed to differences between landraces and modern varieties.

The brake was further evaluated in more complex models comparing models without the brake (models 3–4, table 2 ) to models with the brake (models 5–6, table 2 ) suggesting increased fit and a highly significant deviance in favor of the “brake” function comparing the best fitted models (6d & 4d) (chi2 = 67, df≈2, p<.001).

After adjustment for origin the three miRNAs 122, 192 and 21 turned out to be highly significant co-variables in the logistic regression analysis (OR 0.592/p = 0.001, OR 0.487/p = 0.002 and OR 0.309/p<0.0001, respectively) ( Table 2 ).

However, in the case of Cairns, this pattern of results was highly significant ( χ 2 ( N = 1,099, df = 1) = 12.08, p < .001, Phi = .11).

A highly significant correlation emerged between the percentage use of the ultrasonic scalpel and the duration of the procedures (rho = 0.8254 p<0.001).

These differences among years were highly significant ( X 2 (9) = 58.62, p<0.001), confirming the value of the sensitivity analysis excluding year 2010.

Both correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001).

However, threshold shift was highly significant for all frequencies (p<0.001).

Among the mothers reported violent exposure, 42.27% adopted moderate disciplinary practices while 37.12% used severe disciplinary practices, indicating a highly significant association ( p < 0.001).