Excerpts

As shown in Fig 5 , a highly significant correlation between LV active force σ and the Seattle 5-year score was found (R = 0.77, p = 2.7x10 -5 ).

When the imbalances observed in our samples at the SNPs rs6983267 , rs961253 , rs3802842 , rs10411210 , rs4444235 , rs4779584 , and rs9929218 were combined with those published previously [19] , [35] , we observed a highly significant relative loss of the non-risk T allele of rs6983267 (p-value = 2.94×10 −5 ).

In the itpr mutant condition 50 down-regulated genes cluster in the mitochondrion ( Fig 2 ; CC) and a highly significant number (P = 3.2E−5) have the molecular function (MF) of oxido-reduction.

According to an ANOVA analysis the difference in plant biomass is highly significant ( p -value = 3.64e-05) between the two treatments.

Beginning with occurrence as source language and LPI rank, we note that the correlation is positive, not exceptionally strong, but clearly significant ( R = 0.41, p = 3.9e-05).

Results As expected, a highly significant association (p = 0.00004) was found with rs3763313, corresponding to the well established major effect of the MHC [12] .

In the simpler model without the interaction term, there was a highly significant effect of gender (beta = 49.5, 95% CI 26.7 to 72.3, p = 0.00004), but no significant effect of genotype on TGMV (beta = −1.973, 95% CI −19.4 to 15.4, p = 0.822).

Apart from immunity and defense ( P = 5.84×10 −11 ), other highly significant biological processes highlighted include chemokine and chemokine-mediated signaling ( P = 4.53×10 −5 Table 3 ).

Using a logistic regression on the model ln(w ij /(1−w ij )) = a+b ln(P i P j ) , we observe a highly significant negative correlation between confirmation probability w ij and log-transformed popularities of the interaction partners ( a = −1.41±0.04; b = −0.020±0.005, p = 4.8*10 −5 ; N = 62,864 statements).

When exposing 104C1 cells that acquire a fibroblast morphology to increasing concentrations of KDC203, we observed highly significant ( p <0.00005) dose-dependent reductions in PrP C levels ( Fig 2A ).

-0.15 SD, respectively and the difference was highly significant (t(52) = 5.25, p = 0.00005).

This model was highly significant (χ 2 [849] = 1775.03, p<0.00005), indicating the five factor model was a poor fit.

Taking a total of a 20-week interval (as transmission events between hospital cases with an onset further than 20 weeks apart is assumed to be unlikely), the model revealed a highly significant Box-Pierce Q-statistic (X 2 = 54.59, degrees of freedom (df) = 20, p = 0.00005), indicating non-independence.

There was such increases of 4.4 dB for each of the groups Education , Other and Music , and they were highly significant (p<0.00005, Tukey's HSD).

The trained birds' preference for the Dreadnought Grey disc was statistically highly significant (P<0.00005, using the binomial statistics described in “ Methods ”).

Of note, BABAM1 is the most highly significant CNV associated locus following full statistical correction of population stratification (p = 5.16×10 −5 ).

Additionally, a locus on chromosome 14, within a cluster of SNPs showed a trend toward significance (p = 5.24E-05).

While the enrichment of the mTOR signaling KEGG pathway (hsa04150) was not statistically significant, the enrichment of genes from a manually curated mTOR signaling network [57] was highly significant in our dataset (p = 5.5×10 −5 ).

We discovered that there was a highly significant over-representation of genes involved in development amongst spatially clustered T-DMRs that are hypomethylated in MBCs versus CVS (p = 0.00005574).

All seven SNPs of the CEP68 gene showed linkage disequilibrium (LD), and the haplotype of CEP68_ht4 (T-G-A-A-A-C-G) showed a highly significant association with aspirin intolerance (OR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.64–4.21; P = 6.0×10 −5 ).

Further, an alternative χ 2 test comparing the null expectation of no association between head-to-head competitions and ranked attraction index revealed this association was highly significant ( P = 0.00006).

This implies 5.3-fold highly significant (p = 6.3×10 −5 ) excess of the observed associations compared to those by chance.

The difference between the two groups was considered highly significant, as the sum of chi square values comparing the two groups was 19.07 and p = 0.00007.

Correlation between PD and PDR performance We found a highly significant, positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation, r = 0.72, p = 0.00007) between the individual performances in the PD and PDR tasks, i.e. subjects that needed a high number of trials to reach the criterion in the visual discrimination task also needed a high number of trials to reach the criteri

A Smirnov-Kolmogorov test evaluating the difference between the empirical distributions and the straight line gives a highly significant result, p = 0.00007 in the case of maxima (panel B), and p = 0.006 in the case of minima (panel C).