Excerpts

We identified 175 and 189 probe sets (genes) with highly significant strain differences (p<0.005, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test correction) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively.

Glass slides inoculated with MRSA strain M1 and treated with singular phage showed highly significant reductions in CFUs (p ≤ 0.005) compared to mock treatments ( Fig 2B ).

The overall AMOVA test also showed a highly significant effect of land use ( P <0.005).

In each case, the difference between likelihoods of topologies was highly significant (p<0.005), indicating that there was no support for a tree in which dealbatus is monophyletic and sister to a monophyletic clade of alexandrinus samples.

We found the highly significant three-way interaction between species, time, and BMCS presence (F = 3.864, P = 0.005).

Nevertheless, the effect of forest damage was highly significant in permutation-based ANOVAs for both DWA groups ( P = 0.005 in both cases).

The amount of inhibition was 66–78% compared to the enzyme buffer control and was highly significant for both strains for both dispersin B and the enzyme mixture ( P <0.005) as determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis.

Furthermore, there was a strong and highly significant correlation between scores from both raters (P = 0.005, Spearman's coefficient 0.75).

The results reveal that, while comparing the protein expression in the intact worm segments, the third day regenerated part shows higher expression of TCTP, the result is considerably significant ( P <0.005).

However, four highly significant ( P <0.005) QTLs were revealed by the nonparametric mapping test analogous to one-way analysis of variance [39] on chromosomes 3 ( Mi-GI h -C03 1 , BNL3408), 4 ( Mi-GI b -C04 1 , MUSSS396_N-111), 11 ( Mi-GI b -C11 1 , BNL1231), and 17 ( Mi-GI h -C17 1 , MUSB0224_320) in Experiment I accounting for 12.3, 11.5, 10.1, and 7.95% of the phenotypic variance in GI, respectively ( Table 1 , Figure 3 ).

Our analyses revealed low, but highly significant (P < 0.005), correlations between pairwise inter-individual genetic distances and all measures of landscape connectivity (geographic distances and resistance distances; Fig 3A ).

However, the results remained highly significant (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.79; p = 0.005).

When evaluating the individual average contributions over all periods across PCC and FR, we find that there is a highly significant difference across these two treatments (Non-parametric Mann Whitney test, z = -2.791, p = 0.005).

129.0±2.8 mmHg, P >0.28), hypertensives demonstrated highly significant increases in systolic blood pressure during wakefulness after sleep (135.0±3.3 mmHg vs. 120.5±3.0 mmHg, P <0.005; interaction group * sleep/wake: F (2,44) = 3.7, P <0.04, Figure 1 ).

Data Analysis Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the rates of mutation for each gene between the two genders with a p-value of <0.05 considered indicative of a positive trend and a p-value of <0.005 considered statistically significantly due to Bonferroni correction.

In a general linear model of body condition index as a function of Julian day, breeding state, and an interaction term, all three terms were highly significant (p<0.005).

The values of F/Wald-statistics are highly significant (p<0.005), which reveal that our models are good-fit.

The comparison of these changes in the walking test between the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.005, Mann-Whitney, two- tailed test). 8.

Only highly significant gene-sets (p < 0.005; FDR < 1%) are shown as nodes in the enrichment map.

Statistical analysis revealed that these differences were highly significant (p<0.005).

This difference identifies a highly significant interaction between the two genes (Cox Proportional Hazards analysis; p = 0.005).

While similar numbers of the mutant from low dose challenge were present in the lungs at day 2 PI, recovery dropped off to significantly fewer numbers by day 4 PI ( P <0.05), and to a highly significant difference by day 7 PI ( P <0.005) ( Fig. 10A ).

Throughout the dates, varroa load was highly significant in colonies of the treated cornfields compared to those of the untreated ones (T = 2.81, P = 0.005) ( Table 2 ).

PRLR −/− mice exhibited a basal body weight lower than those of wild type mice [15] , but PEG-SMLA treatment induced a similar highly significant ( p< 0.005) increased mass change in the WT and PRLR −/− treated mice ( Figure 1A ), which was quantified in Figure 1B .

The full model containing all predictors was highly significant, p < .005, indicating that it can differentiate between respondents who plan to have children in the future and those who do not.