lasiocarpa showed parabolic form, but basically showed an increasing trend with increasing water table depth in our data range (R 2 = 0.39, F = 31.972, p < 0.001), while C . angustifolia displayed a negative correlation between height and water table depth (R 2 = 0.05, F = 5.945, p < 0.02).
Excerpts
Highly significant regression patterns were recorded for total parasitoid or specialist parasitoid species richness and parasitism rate were observed (F 1,44 = 15.304, p<0.001; F 1,44 = 17.143, p<0.001).
For convergent validity, the SBERT‐based semantic interdisciplinarity indicator showed moderate but highly significant positive correlations with the two conventional metrics (r = 0.333–0.347, p < 0.001), confirming it captures shared aspects of interdisciplinarity with traditional reference-based measures.
After both S and E had been completed, absolute strength remained significantly reduced in men, while only a statistical trend was observed in women (−19±9%, p<0.001 and −12±12% p = 0.074, respectively.
This result is supported by previously identified highly significant (p<0.001) positive additive (‘bb’) x additive (‘bb’) effects from a joint scaling test using the MRI x SB22 full-sibling family indicating the presence of homozygous loci with an increase in susceptibility [ 19 ].
Fisher’s exact test based on the concatenated Cytb and CR datasets obtained a highly significant ( P <0.001) relationship between genetic variation sites and lineage.
To summarize these results in a single conditional logit model, we added all highly significant (i.e. p<0.001) interactions to a backward-stepwise method of estimating the conditional logit model (Model 2).
All of them showed highly significant heterogeneity (p<.001).
Feedback recipients, in contrast, showed a highly significant Outcomes x Timing interaction, F (1, 116) = 19.6, p < .001, η 2 = .14.
The obtained CV-ANOVA results demonstrated a highly significant model performance with an F-value of 267.637 and an extremely low p-value (P < 0.001).
stoebe and its neighbouring communities In the competition containers, biomass of EU neighbouring community explained a highly significant and substantial amount of the variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.39, Δlog-likelihood = 4.91, P < 0.001; Fig 4a ), but NA neighbouring community did not explain variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.05, Δlog-likelihood = -13.96, P = 0.48; Fig 4b ).
For patient 28 the difference between the means for the 2 sides was highly significant (p<0.001 on Grubb’s test, and outside the outer fence on Tukey’s test), indicating that this patient was an outlier from the other patients in terms of side variation.
This enrichment was statistically highly significant (two-way ANOVA, P<0.001).
When four additives with RNA and four without RNA content are combined together into two groups, differences between means of percentage of sa WT phenotype is highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P <0.001).
In our data, appendectomy was reported by 6.3% of UC cases, 19.3% of CD cases, and 2.8% of non-IBD participants, and this difference was highly significant (χ2 = 26.9, p < 0.001).
In IPGTT, no significant difference (P<0.01) was found between the basal plasma glucose levels of wistar and GK-Gel from the plasma glucose levels observed after 120 minutes of glucose administration whereas, a highly significant difference (P<0.001) was observed between the basal plasma glucose levels and plasma glucose levels after 120 minutes of glucose administration ( Fig. 2A ) in GK-Saline.
The human group demonstrated a highly significant advantage in procedure time (p = 0.001).
The higher tendency of the bolder fish to leave cover alone led to the bolder fish initiating the majority of joint trips, with highly significant asymmetries in the number of initiations for pairs with large temperamental differences (paired t -tests for SL: t 10 = 6.35, P <0.001; BL: t 9 = 3.82, P = 0.004; figure 2 ) and marginal asymmetries for pairs with moderate temperamental differences (paired t-tests for SM: t 13 = 2.17, P = 0.050; BM: t 24 = 1.98, P = 0.059; figure 2 ).
When compared to the saccharin-exposed animals that received NaCl injections, two factor ANOVA (factors: genotype, treatment) indicated that there was no significant difference in aversion index (AI) on day 1 between WT and GRPR KO mice (F (1,42) = 0.95; p>0.3), no genotype×treatment interaction (F (1,42) = 0.31; p>0.5), but a highly significant difference in AI between the groups that received LiCl versus NaCl injections (F (1,42) = 739.6; p<0.001, Fig. 5A ).
For the genus data set, when comparing each pair of samples, clustering was highly significant (raw p<0.001 and after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p<0.002).
The overall GOF test result from U-CARE showed overdispersion (χ 2 = 83.924, df = 28, P<0.001), and TEST2.CT was highly significant (χ 2 = 37.292, df = 5, P<0.001).
Gene ontology (GO) analysis for biological process (BP) of the 1,314 DEG genes from above ( S6 Table ) revealed 509 GO BP terms, 170 of which were highly significant (FDR adjusted p-value <1e -3 ; S7 Table ).
Although this increase was small, it was highly significant ( P <0.001).
Here, we measured the ratio between CRP and platelet counts (vii); a highly significant negative association with survival was found starting at day 10 (r s = −.65, p≤0.001), more so than CRP values alone; a statistically significant difference between 14 day CRP levels in surviving versus non-surviving animals was confirmed in the current study (p<0.05).
Overall significance of the treatment effect is also highly significant (p<0.001).