Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Inflammatory and Thrombophilia Markers, Angiographic Distribution, and Treatment Outcomes Inflammatory activity, measured by ESR, was significantly higher in stroke-positive Takayasu patients (50.6 ± 11.4 mm/h) compared to stroke-negative cases (26.3 ± 10.6 mm/h) and controls (22.4 ± 8.4 mm/h), indicating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant association between polyposis syndrome status and histopathological subtype (χ 2 = 58.7, p < 0.001), with adenomatous and hamartomatous lesions predominating in syndromic patients, whereas juvenile and inflammatory polyps were almost exclusively observed in non-syndromic cases ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results for Adverse Events The prevalence of experiencing at least one AE was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (0.9322, 95% CI: (0.9111, 0.9534)) than in the monotherapy group (0.8194, 95% CI: (0.6562, 0.9152)), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, sensitivity analyses using worst-case imputation (assuming no improvement for all patients with missing data) confirmed that primary findings remained robust: NPRS results remained highly significant ( t = 28.58, p < 0.001) and SANE results likewise remained significant ( t = 23.77, p < 0.001) under this conservative assumption.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Internal Validation and Model Diagnostics The multivariable binomial logistic regression model constructed to evaluate 12-month mortality demonstrated an excellent overall fit (Deviance = 358, AIC = 370, BIC = 393, McFadden’s R 2 = 0.228) and was statistically highly significant (Omnibus likelihood ratio test χ 2 = 106, df = 5, p < 0.001).
a significant trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
For RCII, the association was stronger and more consistent: per SD increase (OR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00–1.51, p = 0.046) and Q4 (OR 5.20, 95% CI: 2.24–12.08, p < 0.001) both showed significant independent associations, with a significant trend across quartiles ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
NT-proBNP Reflects Hypertrophy Rather than Dilatation or Dysfunction Highly significant correlations were found for interventricular septal thickness (LVH, r = 0.678; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = 0.243; p = 0.276, Figure 3 A,D), left ventricular maximum wall thickness (LVH, r = 0.717; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = −0.227; p = 0.502, Figure 3 B,E) and left ventricular mass index (LVH, r = 0.549; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = 0.184; p = 0.298, Figure 3 C,F).