Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Accordingly, patients with a deterioration after initiation of treatment showed a massive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) worsening in the FVC slope (right panel, right part), as compared to the similarly significant ( p < 0.001) slight improvement in the FVC decline in those patients stable upon initiation of pirfenidone treatment (left panel, right part).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results for Adverse Events The prevalence of experiencing at least one AE was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (0.9322, 95% CI: (0.9111, 0.9534)) than in the monotherapy group (0.8194, 95% CI: (0.6562, 0.9152)), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001 ).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our analysis revealed the following significant correlations between VA and satisfaction or frequency of spectacle use: A moderate positive correlation (rho = 0.635) exists between UDVA and satisfaction without spectacles at far distance, with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.001); we also observed a moderate negative correlation (rho = −0.412) between UDVA and the frequency of use of spectacles for medium distance, with a statistically significant p -value ( p = 0.041).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of Gene Expression and Protein Levels Among Themselves and Between Psychic Experiences Scale Scores in Control Groups Like the patient group, a highly significant positive correlation was found between the DAT and VMAT2 protein levels in both control groups (SCG; n = 30 r = 0.786 p < 0.001, NSCG; 31 r = 0.936 p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Formal nested-model comparison confirmed this interpretation: adding ΔR(M–C) to a reduced model already containing Cobb_XR, TK_XR, and anthropometric covariates produced a highly significant improvement in model fit for FVC% (partial F = 103.0, p < 0.001; ΔAIC = −86.7), indicating substantial information gain rather than redundant variance.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
According to the cut-off value determined by ROC analysis for SII, median PFS was 5 months (95% CI, 2.94–7.06) in the low SII group and 4 months (95% CI, 2.79–5.21) in the high SII group, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).