Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,842 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp-value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These factors were significant only in the previous negative tests for COVID-19, previously quarantined patients (97.1% and 70.6%, p-value = 0.001 and 0.002 respectively) and for contact tracing Vietnamese measures (p-value = 0.011) but highly significant concerning age component (mean = 62, SD = 14.6, p-value < 0.001 ).
a significant trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
On running the Mann-Kendall test on temperature and rainfall data, the null hypothesis (H 0 ) of “no trend present” is tested against the alternative hypothesis (H 0 ) of “trend present.” The results from the test show that there exists a significant trend in the Minimum Temperature (p < 0.001) whilst the behavior of Maximum Temperature (p < 0.281) and Rainfall (p < 0.068) recorded over the period shows no significant trend (see Table 4 ). 4 Discussion 4.1 Land use change analysis To fully appreciate the degree of cover changes over the 30 years, the annual rate of change was used ( Eq.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There is a highly significant positive correlation between TDF and oil content (0.407, p < 0.001) as both fiber and fat decrease starch digestibility (as evidenced by the negative correlation of starch with TDF and oil) and thus would have a positive correlation with each other.
highly significantP < 0.0030130.1× alphaqualifiedgold
2.2 Combining ability effects estimated The analysis of variance for the combining ability ( Table 3 ) revealed that the mean squares of GCA was positive and highly significant for the days to harvest (P < 0.003013), HPW (P < 0.0009951), HSW (P < 0.048880), SYH (P < 0.01811), pod length (P < 1,878e-07), pod width (P < 0.0011664), seed length (P < 0.006127), and seed width (0.04096).
partially significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Attention by gender to body attractiveness of the influencers was confirmed when it was verified that males placed faster attention (TFF = 0.33; p = 0.994), of longer duration (TFD = 3.99; p = 0.204), and with a higher number of fixations (FC = 7.33; p = 0.898), on the buttocks of the female influencer; the attention by females was partially significant with regard to the stimuli in which the male influencer showed his naked torso (E6-AOI3; TFF = 2.10, p = 0.004; TFD = 1.58, p = 0.001; FC = 3.59, p = 0.075), with the greatest differences being seen in E8-AOI 2 (TFD = 2.08, p =<0.001; FC = 5.73, p =<0.001).