The results revealed a highly significant main effect of test duration [ F (5,65) = 226.765, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.946], showing the reproduction durations increasing as a function of the test durations.
Excerpts
novel pseudowords), were highly significant (contrast 7: x = 31, y = 0, z = -23, t (33) = 3.25, k = 207 voxels, p < 0.001; contrast 8: x = 31, y = 4, z = -19, t (32) = 3.39, k = 116 voxels, p < 0.001.
These variables are: firstly, the relationship with socially maladjusted peers, which has a positive and highly significant effect on the duration of child welfare trajectories ( β = 0.459, p < 0.001); it is followed by the school disengagement variable showing a direct and significant effect on the duration of the experience in the child welfare system ( β = 0.362, p < 0.05), followed, in third place, by the drug use variable, which was shown to have a direct effect on drug use ( β = 0.204, p < 0.01) on the number of programs in the child welfare system in which young people have participated. 4.
A paired Wilcoxon Rank test demonstrated that this difference is highly significant (W = 40.5, p < 0.001). 5.2.1.
Crucially, a highly significant Group × Modality interaction was observed [ F (2, 697.78) = 6.68, p = 0.001], confirming that native speakers and learners employ distinct strategies in modulating global pitch range to signal sentence function.
School public areas also highly significant for both Portuguese and Mathematics [ χ ( M ) 2 = 25.83, p < 0.001; χ ( P ) 2 = 28.18, p < 0.001].
Although reduced, emotional interference was still highly significant in the post-test, F (1,51) = 13.198, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.206.
The interaction between perceived responsiveness and utilitarian motivation was highly significant (b = 0.16, SE = 0.03, t = 5.00, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.09, 0.22]).
Differences between BFLA and ESLA for individual parental responses were statistically highly significant, χ 2 (2, N = 49) = 35.753, p < 0.001 9 .
Results showed a highly significant difference in grade distribution across profiles ( H = 19.628, p < 0.001).
For example, for the 14 ability domains used in the College Board survey, Kruger (1999) found a highly significant relationship between domain difficulty and the percentage of participants rating themselves as better than average in that domain, r = -0.81, p < 0.001.
Furthermore, all the factor loadings are highly significant ( p < 0.001), and both the coefficient alpha values (0.880–0.931) and the composite reliabilities (0.882–0.926) of all the constructs exceed the 0.70 benchmark.
Regarding the fixed effects (see Table 1 ), a highly significant Time × Group interaction was observed, F (1, 195.00) = 90.43, p < 0.001, with a substantial effect size ( η p 2 = 0.32).
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 = 3876.42, df = 153, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was appropriate for factor analysis.
The statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences with moderate to strong effect sizes on the multivariate level [ F (6,214) = 7.05, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.17], on the univariate level for the PTSD severity [ F (3,108) = 5.88, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.14] and for the sum score of the regularly experienced violence [ F (3,108) = 14.09, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.28].
When the data were disaggregated by the window, there was a moderately significant correlation between windows 1 and 2 ( r = 0.383, p < 0.001).
For the language tasks, the Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test demonstrated a highly significant effect of group, F (2, 54) = 34.829, p < 0.001, and this was driven by all three groups being significantly different from one another: non-native signer < native signer, p = 0.029, non-native signer < hearing, p = 0.001, and native signer < hearing, p = 0.009.
We crucially found that this interaction was negative and highly significant (β = 3.37, SE = 0.54, z = 6.21, p < 0.001).
Additionally, the interaction effect between phonological and orthographic similarity was highly significant [ F 1 (1, 521) = 30.36, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.06; F 2 (1, 252) = 115.24, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.31].
Both the Begg and Mazumbar’s test and the Egger’s test resulted in highly significant indicators of publication bias ( P < 0.001).
The KMO statistic was 0.846 (overall; per-item MSAs ranged 0.777–0.895, all above the 0.70 threshold), and Bartlett's test was highly significant, χ 2 (28) = 14,651.70, p < 0.001, indicating that the correlation matrix was suitable for factor analysis.
Overall, the regression model was highly significant [ F (1, 48) = 55.39, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.53] and yielded a significant coefficient for trial (β = 0.02, t = 7.44, p < 0.001), which indicates that the difference across the two conditions increased logarithmically over time.
Results Is LG-OST Effective in Reducing Dental Fear at Post Treatment? MANOVA showed a highly significant main effect of time [ F (6,29) = 8.41, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.64].
As the difference in age was highly significant between the groups [ F (3, 186) = 101, p < 0.001], it was included as a covariate. 3.2 Results for the main hypotheses In the total sample, the SC-IAT showed high internal consistency (adjusted r = 0.87), in line with our hypothesis ( H1 ).
When the empathy quotient is zero, the impostor syndrome is estimated at 73.711 with a standard error of 0.821 and is highly significant ( p < 0.001).